Orange County NC Website
Abigaile Pittman said this is a plan that offers criteria and a map <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the abstract says this says it is a draft plan <br /> Abigail Pittman said this draft plan offers criteria and a map on future access and <br /> connectivity through the EDD. She said the highlights review existing conditions and how staff <br /> arrived here today. She said this is not a plan that examines any one development proposal, but <br /> it is a policy guideline with criteria to guide future development actions. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he feels that he needs a more specific plan of what this <br /> means. He said this is only a criticism of his own lack of understanding. He referred to the signal <br /> intersections map. He said a plan, to him, states a list of what will be done. He asked what the <br /> Board would be approving when this comes back in two months. <br /> Tom Altieri said what will be coming back will be the entire plan. He said this is pages 6— <br /> 38 of the agenda packet. He said the map that Commissioner Dorosin refers to is within that plan. <br /> He said this could also be referred to as an access management plan for the area. He said this <br /> map is really a conceptual plan that provides the County the opportunity for future development. <br /> He said this will give the County future opportunity to get signals added, and to require <br /> easements for service roads to maintain the integrity of the existing roadway. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he is still not satisfied that there are enough details. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she has no objection to getting more information on the Saint <br /> Mary's scenic byway. She said scenic byways just prescribe what kind of signs can be put up. <br /> She is not sure that a designation of Highway10 as a scenic byway will address the concerns <br /> expressed by the public. She said the main concern of residents is keeping commercial traffic off <br /> Old 10. <br /> Chair Jacobs said Saint Mary's scenic corridor has standards that were developed 15-20 <br /> years ago. He said these standards encompass much more than just signs, including setbacks <br /> and other provisions. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said it matters whether the term used is scenic byway or scenic <br /> corridor. She was referring to a state scenic byway. <br /> Chair Jacob said the term is scenic corridor. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said that this item is confusing to the Board as well as the public, <br /> because it is really just a plan for a plan. She said this has to be done in order to develop details <br /> later on when there are requests for lights, bike lanes or other items. She said transportation <br /> planning is so complicated due to the all the different organizations involved on a federal, state, <br /> urban planning and rural level. She clarified that this plan is simply a placeholder to put ideas <br /> there for future implementation. <br /> Craig Benedict said this type of plan is needed to get funding for projects from DOT. He <br /> said it will help make any future development more manageable. He said this is a step in the <br /> process to manage growth. He said he understands the Board's comments regarding the <br /> comparison to the scenic corridor. <br /> Chair Jacobs emphasized that an access management plan also limits access. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes, 2 nays (Commissioner Dorosin and Commissioner Price) <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the idea of a plan that doesn't really have to be followed is not <br /> satisfying. He said he appreciates the complexity of transportation planning, but he feels it is <br /> more useful to put more time in at the front end. <br /> Commissioner Price said more work needs to be done to outline how this transportation <br /> plan will fit in with the proposed land use. She said this plan has been sitting on paper for <br /> decades, and she feels it should be re-visited before anything is put in stone. <br /> Commissioner Rich said her understanding is that this plan is not set in stone but is meant <br /> to give direction moving forward toward a solid plan. <br /> Commissioner Price said once it is voted it seems to become a reference point. <br /> Pete Hallenbeck said it would be helpful to have the Planning Board make a map with the <br /> addresses of all of the people who signed the petition. He said this would help everyone see <br /> where the affected people are located. <br />