Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 8/26/96 Public HeariRP-FT 9 <br /> Minutes <br /> 2 3. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> 3 (a) Section IV-8-5-e Lot Layout <br /> 4 This item was presented by May Willis to consider a proposed amendment to clarify <br /> 5 Section IV-8-5-e by subsbditing the word'divided'for the word'separated'. The proposed amendment would <br /> 6 provide more darity in the text. It would not result in a substantive change to any regulation. <br /> 7 <br /> $ COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS -None <br /> 9 <br /> 10 COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -None <br /> 11 <br /> 12 COMMENTS AND/OR 01110MONS FROM CRRENS -None <br /> 13 <br /> 14 A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit seconded by Commissioner Gordon,to refer the proposed <br /> 15 amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> 16 sooner than October 1,1996. <br /> 17 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 18 <br /> 19 (b) Securing Subdivision improvements <br /> 20 1)Section III-E(new)improvements(was V-0-8) <br /> 21 2)Section 111-C-2*Application Requirements(Wor Subdivisions) <br /> 2Z 3)Section 111-0-2-&(7)Application Requirements(Preliminary Plat) <br /> 23 4)Section 111-D-3a Application Requirements(Final Plat) <br /> 24 This item was presented to receive citizen comment on proposed amendments <br /> 25 to the Subdivision Regulations to relocate provisions regarding required improvements from Section V,-Plat <br /> 26 Sped6adons.'to Section III,'Application and Approval Procedures,'rewrite the section for clarity and to add <br /> 27 language regarding construction Casts estimates and financial guarantees- <br /> 28 <br /> 29 COIiLMOM AN MB QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMPM&MONERS•Norte <br /> 30 <br /> 31 comMENTs AmploR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -None <br /> 32 <br /> 33 comINEM AHMR QUESDONS FROM CITIZENS -None <br /> 34 <br /> 35 A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit,seconded by Commissioner Crowther,to refer the proposed <br /> 36 amendment to the Planing Board for a recornmendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> 37 sooner than October 1,1996. <br /> 38 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 39 (c) Cluster Subdivision Provisions <br /> 40 1)Section fV_8-9 Cuter Developments <br /> 41 2)Section 111-0 Approval Procedures for Major Subdivisions <br /> 42 3)Sectiort V A Specfic--tions for Plat Drawings <br /> 43 This itarn was presented to consider a proposed amendment to re-adopt duster <br /> 44 subdivision provisions and Concept Plant application and approval procedures in the Rural Buffer The flexible <br /> 45 development pmvisions are applicable in ON residential zoning dish cts except the Rural Buller. Deleting the <br /> 46 previous duster regulations and Concept Plan application and approval procedures had the unintended result <br /> 47 of epffdna*V those provisions in the Rural Buffer. The Planning Staff recommends that the previous provisions <br /> 48 be ro-adopbed 10 spply to that district only. <br /> 49 <br /> 60 COMMENTS ANDFOR CgjESMNS EMU THE AQARD F -None <br /> 52 COMMEEM AM=g gLg=N3 FROM THE JILANNING 110ARD -None <br /> 53 <br /> 54 CONNINNEM ApIpM ouLaMNS FROM -None <br /> 55 <br />