Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-01-1996 - 10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 10-01-1996
>
Agenda - 10-01-1996 - 10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 12:55:38 PM
Creation date
11/5/2013 12:55:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19961001
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: October 1. 1996 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item # /0-Q <br /> SUBJECT: REPORT- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS FOR COMMISSIONER <br /> ELECTIONS <br /> ACTION BY: <br /> DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: Yes_.X—No <br /> BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes_X_No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Stancil <br /> Eat 2590 <br /> • Map of Potential Districts <br /> • Summary Demographic Report <br /> TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br /> Hillsborough -732-8181 <br /> Durham -688-7331 <br /> Mebane -227-2031 <br /> Chapel Hill -967-9251 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider a draft of potential Residential Districts for future election of County <br /> Commissioners. <br /> BACKGROUND: On August 20,the Board of Commissioners considered an item on future district <br /> election of County Commissioners. Currently, Commissioners are elected at-large <br /> in partisan primary and general elections and serve staggered four-year terms. In <br /> response to calls from some citizens to have Commissioners elected by district, <br /> the Board discussed the possibility that future elections be conducted by <br /> Residential District using countywide vote of the electorate. <br /> Under this proposal,the current staggered terms and partisan primary process <br /> would continue to apply. The County would be divided into five Residential <br /> Districts of roughly-equal population, and each district would be represented by <br /> one seat on the Board. All registered voters in the County would be eligible to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.