Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-01-1996 - 8f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 10-01-1996
>
Agenda - 10-01-1996 - 8f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 12:14:58 PM
Creation date
11/5/2013 12:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19961001
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> ARTICLE 7 SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS(Continued) <br /> PLANNING BOARD OF <br /> BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED COMMISSIONERS <br /> FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS <br /> Ordinance Requirements <br /> b)3. Walkways form safe,convenient _x—Yes No No system of walkways is Yes No <br /> system of access to dwellings, shown. The maximum distance <br /> facilities and off-site between a school building and <br /> designations. Maximum walking parking is approximately 75 <br /> distance between dwellings and feet. <br /> parking;delivery and refuse <br /> collection areas does not <br /> exceed 100 feet. <br /> Walkways used as play areas _x—Yes No Since there is no through traffic, Yes No <br /> or school routes by children vehicle speeds are slow,allowing <br /> located and designed to minimize for safe pedestrian circulation. <br /> contact with vehicular traffic. Most of the existing structures/ <br /> Crossings appropriately marked facilities are located on the <br /> and safeguarded. west side of the entrance drive <br /> which minimizes pedestrian crossings. <br /> b)4. Protection of visibility- <br /> See a)3.and b)3.above. <br /> b)5. Open space and spacing between _x—yes No Open space requirements are met. Yes No. <br /> buildings-See Article 6 No standards are provided in <br /> standards. Article 6 for spacing between <br /> non-residential buildings. <br /> ARTICLE 5 DIMENSIONAL REQj7IREMENTS("Yes"indicates compliance* "No"indicates non-compliance) <br /> PLANNING BOARD OF <br /> BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED COMMISSIONERS <br /> FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS <br /> Ordinance ReQuirements <br /> Article 5 lists standards for <br /> minimum lot size,lot width, <br /> front,side and rear setbacks, <br /> maximum building height and lot <br /> coverage,and development intensity. <br /> The applicant has applied for a <br /> PD-RB designation. The standards <br /> for that district are set forth in <br /> Article 5.1.1 and areas follows: <br /> a) Minimum lot area per non- _X—Yes No The lot size shown on plan Yes No <br /> residential use-87.120 sq.ft. is 1,478,426 sq.ft. <br /> (33.94 acres) <br /> 'Finding affected by modification,PD-1-96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.