Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT 14 <br /> 1 8/26/96 Public Hearing Minutes <br /> 2 3. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> 3 (a) Section IV-8-5-e Lot Layout <br /> 4 This item was presented by Mary Willis to consider a proposed amendment to clarify <br /> S Section N-B-S-e by substituting the word-divided-for the word'separated'. The proposed amendment would <br /> 6 provide more dairy in the text. It would not result in a substantive change to any regulation. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 CgNMEM A R QUE ONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS -None <br /> 9 <br /> 10 cn AND/OR eLFCTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -None <br /> 12 COMMEMM AND/OR UESTIONS FROM CITIZENS -None <br /> 13 <br /> 14 A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit,seconded by Commissioner Gordon,to refer the proposed <br /> 13 arm merit to the Planning Board We recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> 16 sooner than October 1.19M. <br /> 17 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 18 <br /> 19 (b) Securing Subdivision Improvements <br /> 20 1)Section ill-E(new)improvements(was V-D-8) <br /> 21 2)Section III-C-2&Application Requirements(Miner Subdivisions) <br /> 22 3)Section III-D-2-a.(7)Application Requirements(Preliminary Plat) <br /> 23 4)Section 111-D-3a Application Requirements(Final Plat) <br /> 24 This item was presented to receive citizen comment on proposed amendments <br /> 25 to the Subd vitsion Regulations to relocate provisions regarding required improvements tram Section V,'Plat <br /> 26 Specifications.'to Section III,'Application and Approval Procedures.'rewrite the section for charity and to add <br /> 27 language regarding construction costs estimates and financial guarantees. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 COMMENTS AN OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COM LONERS-None <br /> 30 <br /> 31 COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -Nam <br /> 32 <br /> 33 COUNTS ANDIOR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS -None <br /> 34 <br /> 35 A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit.seconded by Commissioner Crowther,to refer the proposed <br /> 36 amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> 37 sooner than October 1,19%. <br /> 38 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 39 (c) Cluster Subdivision Provisions <br /> 40 1)Section IV-13-9 Cluster Developments <br /> 41 2)Section 111-0 Approval Procedures for Major Subdivisions <br /> 42 3)Section V-A Specifications for Piet Drawings <br /> 43 This item was presented to consider a proposed amendment to re-adopt duster <br /> 44 subdivision provisions and Concept Plan application and approval procedures in the Rural Buffer. The flexible <br /> 45 development provisions are applicable in all residential zoning districts except the Rural Buffer. Deleting the <br /> 46 previous duster regulations and Concept Plan application and approval procedures had the unintended result <br /> 47 of eliminating those provisions in the Rural Buffer. The Planning Staff recommends that the previous provisions <br /> 48 be readopted Ip apply to that district only. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 COMMENTS A 8.gLffi=W2 FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS_-None <br /> 51 <br /> 52 =NjgXM ANpIM j2ueSTKMj FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -None <br /> 53 <br /> 64 QAMYPmyq AND.x+R QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS -None <br />