Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT <br /> 1 8/26/96 Public Hearing Minutes 5 <br /> 2 3. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> 3 (a) Section IV-B-S-e Lot Layout <br /> 4 This item was presented by May Willis to consider a proposed amendment to clarify <br /> 5 Section N-B-S a by wbstituting the word'divided'for the word'separated'. The proposed amendment would <br /> 6 provide mom deft in the tact. It would not result in a substantive change to any regulation. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 COMMENTS ANDIOR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF C01111111SSiONERS -None <br /> 9 <br /> 10 COME=AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -None <br /> 11 <br /> 12 COMMENTS AND/OR OLIF.913ONS FROM CITQENS -None <br /> 13 <br /> 14 A motion was made by Commissioner VAhoit,seconded by Commissioner Gordon,to refer the proposed <br /> 15 amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> 16 sooner than October 1.1996. <br /> 17 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 18 <br /> 19 (b) Securing Subdivision Improvements <br /> 20 1)Section III-E(new)Improvements(was V-D-8) <br /> 21 2)Section III-C-2s Application Requirements(Minor Subdivisions) <br /> 22 3)Section Ilt-D-2-a.(7)Application Requirements(Preliminary Plat) <br /> 23 4)Section III4)-3a Application Requirements(Final Plat) <br /> 24 This item was presented to receive citizen commen(on proposed amendments <br /> 25 to the Subdivision Regulations to relocate provisions regarding required improvements from Section V,'Plat <br /> 26 Specifications.'to Section III,'Application and Approval Procedures,'rewrite the section for clarity and to add <br /> 27 language regarding construction costs estimates and financial guarantees. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 COMMENTS ANDIOB QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS-None <br /> 30 <br /> 31 COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD -None <br /> 32 <br /> 33 MUMENTS ANDMR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS -None <br /> 34 <br /> 35 A motion was made by Commissioner VW#xgt,seconded by Commissioner Crowther,to refer the proposed <br /> 36 amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> 37 sooner than October 1,19%. <br /> 38 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 39 (c) Cluster Subdivision Provisions <br /> 40 1)Section IV-8-9 Cluster Developments <br /> 41 2)Section 111-0 Approval Procedures for Major Subdi tsions <br /> 42 3)Section V-A Specifications for Plat Drawings <br /> 43 This item was presented to consider a proposed amendment to re-adopt duster <br /> 44 subdivision provisions and Concept.Plan application and approval procedures in the Rural Buffer. The flexibte <br /> 45 development provisions are applicable in aY residential zoning districts except the Rural Buffer. Deleting the <br /> 46 previous cluster reguhalons and Concept Plan application and approval procedures had the unintended result <br /> 47 of erunina*V those provisions in the Rural Buffer. The Planning Staff recommends that tl»previous provisions <br /> 48 be readopted to apply to that district only. <br /> 49 <br /> rat COMMENTS A &QUMMNS FROM THE BOARD OF C01111NIMSIONERS-None <br /> S1 <br /> 52 CONNIMM A it QLMSMMS FROM THE PIANNING 90AEM -None <br /> 53 <br /> 54 COME u 11 AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM GI T123943 -None <br /> 55 <br />