Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2015 8:49:14 AM
Creation date
11/4/2013 10:41:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-05-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />o, Regarding, traffic concerns, to date, the Town's Transportation Planner has not <br />identified traffic congestion as an imue in, the vicinity of Fidelity Strut and , Davie <br />Road, <br />o Regarding analysis of the availability of on-street parking, mote tit Fidelity Street <br />has bike lanes. here is no parkin, , in biL- lane s generally, per Town Code See. <br />6-18(a)(14); parking is allowed on the south side. of Fidelity Street adjacent, to the <br />town omnetery idtiring funerals, per 6-18(b)(1)(h). The sme section allows <br />parking during certain hours (e.g. Fanine"' Market) but the extent of that <br />excerption only goes to the western White Oak driveway; <br />A site constraints map from the Town's GIS systemi is attached (Attachirient D). The <br />map shows a stretum, and assuuinted buffer, along with various mixed trw arms and a, <br />small, hardwood trees area in the southeast corner of the site. With the exception of the <br />stream buffer (in the northeast. area of the site) (buffer extends 30-,feet on either side of <br />the stream) there do not appear to, be any UJO regulated area that could not be disturbed <br />ontlic site. Again,, the LUO is written in a, way that strives for retention of the mixed, tree <br />areas: but intrusion into such areas is not forbidden from a regulatory perspective for 8, <br />non-re sideotial project; <br />'Tbe'Town Attorney has Prepared Or response to the question, of liability associated with <br />excavation and blastin& which is attached (Altadliment E). <br />_J 20 Hrr, wq Lgne, theHuderprogerty: <br />Copies of the approved project plans and conditional use perrnit for the Butler property <br />are included with, this reply (AIMchment F), <br />'Modifying the conditional Use PeTJ-,ni( to allow a library and other govemmental uses <br />would need to he initiated by or with permission of the pennit holder. Wbether a public <br />hearing would be needed for such a request would be determined once it was clear how <br />much change was being requested from what was previously approved. This would <br />include physical changes to the, site dusign, as -well as traffic inipact changes, sk) an update <br />to the traffic and parking study would most likely be needed. LIDO Section 15-64 guides <br />staff in determining wh dAher the requested changes should be considered minor or major. <br />Generally, a modified plan would go through the Town's development re ,view process, <br />which would include review by snultiple ageiies for compliance with all applicable <br />ordinwices and regulations, Depending on the extent of change from what was originally <br />approved, swJi a review could take a few months or PD5SibIY:SCVCTal months if the <br />changes are deterrnined to "be major in nature, [fconsiderod a 1-major change, then the <br />LUO does also require a concept review witli the Town,s advisory boards linor to <br />submittal of an application. <br />Page2 Df 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.