Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
55 <br />56 <br />57 <br />58 <br />59 <br />60 <br />61 <br />62 <br />63 <br />64 <br />65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />68 <br />69 <br />70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />76 <br />77 <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />81 <br />82 <br />83 <br />84 <br />1 <br />Michael Harvey: No. This is rural residential zoning. <br />Maxecine Mitchell: Will this company's future expansion create more job opportunities and is this something we <br />should take into consideration for this proposal? <br />Michael Harvey: It shouldn't be part of the consideration but Mr. Kizer did make comment at the public hearing that <br />additional jobs would be created. <br />Paul Guthrie: Will that sewer system that is going through there have the capacity to handle that operation or will <br />there have to be pre- treatment? <br />Craig Benedict: The system is in the design stages and it will take into consideration the land uses and the water <br />and sewer demand enough to accommodate the change of land uses from what is there now to non - residential. <br />From a demand standpoint, yes we have it covered. We will examine what type of sewer flow they have and <br />sometimes pretreatment is necessary in some manufacturing operations. <br />Maxecine Mitchell: You said that a certain percentage of the R1 could be turned into 11. <br />Michael Harvey: The percentage figure I believe you are referring to was the allowable percentage of impervious <br />surface area on a given lot. The node, as currently defined, allows for minimal high intense residential development <br />in the area. <br />Maxecine Mitchell: If we rezone this will it leave room for more requests? <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. Approval of this request will not limit or hinder future requests from being submitted or heard. <br />MOTION made by Tony Blake to approve attachments 3 and 4 to rezone two parcels totaling 16.1 acres. Seconded <br />by Lisa Stuckey. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />2 <br />22 <br />