Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2015 2:00:30 PM
Creation date
11/4/2013 10:21:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-05-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
ORD-2013-040 Ordinance amending OC Zoning Atlas - Keizer Rezoning of 2.7 Acre Parcel - 3604
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2013
ORD-2013-041 Ordinance denying OC Zoning Atlas Amendment - Keizer Rezoning of 2.7 Acre Parcel - 3604 Southern Drive. See ORD-2013-40 for correct Ord.
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2013
RES-2013-087 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
RES-2013-088 NO ACTION - Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment with the Adopted OC 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />Michael Harvey said the map does not designate zoning; it designates land use <br />category. He said this category is meant to encourage retail and manufacturing, however there <br />is underlying rural residential zoning in the area. He said this rural /residential zoning is not <br />invalidated, and it is still protected in the UDO. He noted that future use and focus for this area <br />will be additional non - residential application of land use. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked for clarification on the zoning of this area. He said the <br />designations and zoning are confusing. <br />Michael Harvey said, as the comprehensive plan points out, certain areas of the County <br />have been identified as targets to encourage specific types of land use. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said a plan has been developed to encourage certain land use, <br />but this did not include zoning changes to encourage that development. <br />Michael Harvey said this is correct; these areas were not pre- zoned. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if the plan is to re -zone these areas, or if this will happen <br />in a piecemeal fashion like the Board is seeing tonight. <br />Michael Harvey said the plan is that this will happen as the market demands it. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said he is just trying to understand the context. <br />Frank Clifton said there is an assumption by some landowners that re- zoning means <br />values and property taxes will go up. He said this is not necessarily true. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said this map is misleading for a person who is not well versed in <br />this issue. <br />Frank Clifton said the map Commissioner Dorosin is referring to is a planning map for <br />future use, versus a zoning map of current designations. <br />Planning Board member Johnny Randall arrived at 7:37. <br />Commissioner Rich asked how the zoning change will affect the protected watershed <br />area. <br />Michael Harvey said the overlay will not be altered. He said Ronald Keizer and his <br />business will be held to the same standards regarding impervious surface limits and stream <br />buffer protections. <br />Commissioner Price said the packet did not seem to indicate any major changes in the <br />business activity on the property. <br />Michael Harvey said there will be no major changes on this request. He noted the <br />second item is a different request for a different issue. <br />Chair Jacobs said he would like to follow up on Commissioner Dorosin's question. He <br />said one difference between this economic development district and the Hillsborough one is that <br />the others have fewer and larger parcels. He noted that this area is full of smaller residential <br />lots. This makes it challenging to do a blanket re- zoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.