Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2013 8:48:03 AM
Creation date
11/4/2013 8:47:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-05-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 Michael Harvey said the map does not designate zoning; it designates land use <br /> 2 category. He said this category is meant to encourage retail and manufacturing, however there <br /> 3 is underlying rural residential zoning in the area. He said this rural/residential zoning is not <br /> 4 invalidated, and it is still protected in the UDO. He noted that future use and focus for this area <br /> 5 will be additional non-residential application of land use. <br /> 6 Commissioner Dorosin asked for clarification on the zoning of this area. He said the <br /> 7 designations and zoning are confusing. <br /> 8 Michael Harvey said, as the comprehensive plan points out, certain areas of the County <br /> 9 have been identified as targets to encourage specific types of land use. <br /> 10 Commissioner Dorosin said a plan has been developed to encourage certain land use, <br /> 11 but this did not include zoning changes to encourage that development. <br /> 12 Michael Harvey said this is correct; these areas were not pre-zoned. <br /> 13 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the plan is to re-zone these areas, or if this will happen <br /> 14 in a piecemeal fashion like the Board is seeing tonight. <br /> 15 Michael Harvey said the plan is that this will happen as the market demands it. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin said he is just trying to understand the context. <br /> 17 Frank Clifton said there is an assumption by some landowners that re-zoning means <br /> 18 values and property taxes will go up. He said this is not necessarily true. <br /> 19 Commissioner Dorosin said this map is misleading for a person who is not well versed in <br /> 20 this issue. <br /> 21 Frank Clifton said the map Commissioner Dorosin is referring to is a planning map for <br /> 22 future use, versus a zoning map of current designations. <br /> 23 Planning Board member Johnny Randall arrived at 7:37. <br /> 24 Commissioner Rich asked how the zoning change will affect the protected watershed <br /> 25 area. <br /> 26 Michael Harvey said the overlay will not be altered. He said Ronald Keizer and his <br /> 27 business will be held to the same standards regarding impervious surface limits and stream <br /> 28 buffer protections. <br /> 29 Commissioner Price said the packet did not seem to indicate any major changes in the <br /> 30 business activity on the property. <br /> 31 Michael Harvey said there will be no major changes on this request. He noted the <br /> 32 second item is a different request for a different issue. <br /> 33 Chair Jacobs said he would like to follow up on Commissioner Dorosin's question. He <br /> 34 said one difference between this economic development district and the Hillsborough one is that <br /> 35 the others have fewer and larger parcels. He noted that this area is full of smaller residential <br /> 36 lots. This makes it challenging to do a blanket re-zoning. <br /> 37 Pete Hallenbeck asked for any comments from the planning board, and he introduced <br /> 38 the applicant, Ronald Keizer. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 41 Ronald Keizer, owner of USA Dutch, said he left some brochures regarding his <br /> 42 company. He said he would like to expand his business, and he hopes he will be allowed to do <br /> 43 this. He said he will be happy to answer questions <br /> 44 Chair Jacobs asked if any member of the Board had comments. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner McKee to: <br /> 47 1. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be <br /> 48 returned to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the November 5, 2013 <br /> 49 BOCC regular meeting. <br /> 50 2. Adjourn the public hearing until November 5, 2013 in order to receive and accept the <br /> 51 Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br /> 52 <br /> 53 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.