Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-05-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2013 8:48:03 AM
Creation date
11/4/2013 8:47:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-05-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> 1 Commissioner Pelissier said it sounds like there was no discussion on the task force <br /> 2 regarding contributions from the town for the funding. She said there should have been a <br /> 3 discussion about this, as all of this is contingent on the ETJ in Chapel Hill. <br /> 4 Commissioner Pelissier said it sounds as if the task force did not take a position on the <br /> 5 utility district, except that it be explored. She asked if this is correct. <br /> 6 Commissioner Price said there were discussions regarding the district. She said there <br /> 7 were three plans, but the decision came down to the one that is listed. She said the larger <br /> 8 districts were very costly, involved another phase of planning, and lessened the focus on <br /> 9 Rogers Road. <br /> 10 Commissioner Rich said there were two utility districts that were considered. She said <br /> 11 the idea was to bring down the per parcel cost with a larger district. She said this larger district <br /> 12 was not well received. She said Chapel Hill is still talking about utility districts and looking at <br /> 13 what that means. <br /> 14 Commissioner McKee noted that he was not voicing opposition to the hook-ups. He <br /> 15 was just trying to get clarification on this issue. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin said he believes that the advantage of the ETJ is that it will allow <br /> 17 Chapel Hill to contribute. He proposed that the County's commitment to providing sewer to this <br /> 18 neighborhood should not be contingent on Chapel Hill. He said if Chapel Hill is unable or <br /> 19 unwilling to participate, this does not end the County's obligation to this community. <br /> 20 Commissioner Dorosin referred to the question of funding. He said the County has <br /> 21 already created funds to assist this community. He said there is a fund to pay for the <br /> 22 connection from the main to the meter, which has been infrequently utilized. He said Orange <br /> 23 County is putting funds out there. He said that the County could take underutilized funding and <br /> 24 apply this to the water and sewer connections. <br /> 25 Chair Jacobs referred to the top portion of page 7, which lists the actions taken by local <br /> 26 government. He noted that the Solid Waste fund was allocated by the Orange County Board of <br /> 27 County Commissioners. <br /> 28 Chair Jacobs asked about the issue that Commissioner Dorosin referred to as <br /> 29 "preservation of neighborhood and gentrification." He asked for clarification on this <br /> 30 recommendation. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price said this issue had not been fully addressed. She said there was a <br /> 32 recommendation for all three boards to continue consideration of this. She said RENA would <br /> 33 also be working with the Jackson Center. <br /> 34 Michael Talbert said this information can be found on page 24 of the report, under <br /> 35 gentrification. He said this was a late addition, but there was consensus to add it. <br /> 36 Commissioner Rich said a lot of this was recommended by managers after <br /> 37 consideration of similar issues and lessons learned by Chapel Hill with the Northside area. <br /> 38 David Caldwell, Project Director for RENA, said RENA is getting together with other <br /> 39 community groups in an effort to a have more of a say in the development of the Rogers Road <br /> 40 area. <br /> 41 Commissioner Rich said she has had this discussion with David Caldwell. She said it is <br /> 42 important that the neighbors have input in the development of their own neighborhood. <br /> 43 David Caldwell said he is excited to have use of a gymnasium, auditorium and other <br /> 44 facilities that the community needs. <br /> 45 Commissioner Dorosin thanked Commissioner Price and Commissioner Rich, as well as <br /> 46 the rest of the task force for the work that has been done. <br /> 47 He said there is a perception in the community that the towns are more committed to <br /> 48 this project than Orange County. He said it is imperative that Orange County send a clear <br /> 49 signal of their commitment to seeing this project through. <br /> 50 Commissioner Dorosin made the following motion: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.