Browse
Search
NS ORD-1996-033 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments - Telecommunication Towers
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1990-1999
>
1996
>
NS ORD-1996-033 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments - Telecommunication Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 4:19:39 PM
Creation date
10/31/2013 9:37:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/3/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
VIII-G
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-03-1996 - VIII-G
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1996\Agenda - 09-03-1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> Response to November 27, 1995 Public Hearing Comments (see attached minutes) <br /> 1. Minimizing the Number of New Towers <br /> A major concern of industry representatives was related to the proposed means <br /> by which we would assure that adequate provision had been made to minimize <br /> the number of new towers by sharing space on existing or new towers. <br /> F=n__coraging Use Of Existing Towers <br /> The Zoning Ordinance now requires that efforts to locate on an existing tower <br /> be documented. There are no standards, however, by which to evaluate the <br /> documentation provided. <br /> Proposed Documentation Process: The amendment presented for <br /> public hearing in November, 1995 included a requirement that the <br /> applicant send letters to all tower owners within one mile of the <br /> proposed site requesting information such as availability of lease space, <br /> and tower height and strength. Also required was a copy of responses <br /> received. One concern raised was that the applicant must rely on the <br /> tower owner's response to requests for information, and delays could <br /> result if the tower owner did not prepare the needed information in a <br /> timely manner. The proposed wording was thought to place an implicit <br /> burden of responsibility on the owners of existing towers to provide <br /> detailed engineering and other information, upon the demand of <br /> potential applicants, which could be time-consuming and costly. <br /> The proposed revision continues to require submittal of information <br /> concerning availability of space to lease, and tower height and strength <br /> as was proposed in the initial draft. However, specific requirements as <br /> to how communication between the applicant and the tower owner is to <br /> occur are eliminated. The applicant must contact tower owners in order <br /> to obtain the needed information, however, the proposed revision <br /> focuses on the outcome of that contact,rather than the process. <br /> Location ion of Towers Considered for Possible Co-location: Typically, <br /> the range within which a new tower can perform its function within the <br /> communications network is on the order of 1/4 mile from the proposed <br /> site. There is some variability, however, depending on factors such as <br /> the tower height and topography. <br /> The area within which towers must be identified and evaluated is <br /> proposed to be at least 1 mile for towers 200 feet or taller(as originally <br /> proposed) and one-half mile for towers shorter than 200 feet. In <br /> addition, the applicant must provide an engineer's certification <br /> indicating the widest range from the proposed site within which the <br /> equipment could perform. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.