Orange County NC Website
52 <br /> JUNE 1995 <br /> AMERICAN <br /> PLANNING <br /> ASSOCiA110N <br /> Local Planning Issues in end of last year.That, in turn,has expanded the number of <br /> Siting Cellular Towers cellular transmission sires to 17,920 last December from just <br /> 384 a decade earlier. <br /> In response to both the increasing demand for mobile <br /> By Michelle Gregory communication options and a very aggressive lobbying effort by <br /> the industry,the FCC opened another portion of the airwaves for <br /> In coming months,communities may lose the righc to regulate the industry use.On March 14, the agency completed the biggest <br /> siting of cellular telephone cowers,just as that industry is emerging auction in U.S.history, luting three months and costing <br /> as a major player in the larger telecommunications industry.The telecommunications carriers S7 billion.The airwave rights were <br /> Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) filed a divided geographically into 99 licenses that went to commercial <br /> petition with the Federal Communications Commission(FCC) mobile radio service(CMRS) carriers nationwide.The licenses <br /> last December that asps for federal preemption of local zoning were awarded to the highest bidders among a combination of <br /> powers over cellular cransmission-facilities.—This issue of Zoning older and newly formed companies.The FCC will auction more <br /> News aims to acquaint local planners with the impacts,real and licenses later this year to accommodate private mobile radio <br /> perceived,of cellular towers.Local siting regulations,staff reports, service(PMRS)carriers,which serve freight transporters,public <br /> and telecommunications plans from 15 jurisdictions were reviewed safety entities,citizens band radio,and ham operators.The newly <br /> to provide a summary of siting considerations. licensed carriers are already acquiring sites for towers and their <br /> Planners should understand that some jurisdictions regulate accompanying equipment buildings.Where a market exists for <br /> cellular towers specifically,while others have regulations that cellular communications,local government must be prepared co <br /> apply to"communication towers"generally.Wherever possible, deal with siting issues. <br /> we have tried to cull examples of regulatory techniques specificCamorr rd cellular The industry's growth <br /> to cellular technology.These varying degrees of specificity also }lag has outpaced many local <br /> exist in the regulations of many state communications and tower-a solution to governments'ability to <br /> public utilities agencies.Planners should learn their state's g_ _ understand the impacts of <br /> bureaucratic structure and its definition of communication a cellular towers and, <br /> cowers before drafting local regulations. therefore,co properly sire <br /> Representatives of the cellular industry were also consulted and regulate them.The <br /> for this article.In contrast to the cone of the CTIA petition, situation is further <br /> many expressed an eagerness to work with APA and local complicated when residents, <br /> communities to educate planners and citizens coward the expressing alarm over the <br /> development of safe,fair,and informed regulations. aesthetic and reported <br /> health-related effects of <br /> Cellular History cellular cowers,prompt <br /> In 1974,the FCC expanded the radio spectrum available to the a:.�.._ hasty,reactionary <br /> public in order to make-room for budding cellular telecommu- regulation.To avoid writing <br /> .V • j <br /> nications technology.Through the mid-1980s,the industry , ` '•`A bad law,some communities <br /> worked to develop higher-quality uw=iission devices.Cellular have instituted siting <br /> technology was first marketed-to consumers in the form of the moratoriums until they have <br /> car phone.It presented local governments with the phenomena ample opportunity to <br /> of cellular telephone antennas and the rowers on which they am research and formulate <br /> mounted—cowers that had to be erected somewhere in the regulations thac are fair to <br /> community. Unlike grouvA-wired telecommunications,cellular both the community and <br /> technology made it posul&for a caller to travel while commu- the industry. <br /> nicacing with someone at a conventional telephone or with Both trends have put <br /> another mobile user.Cellular technology,explained in greater carriers on the offensive. <br /> derail below,operates on a fixed number of channels that share Thwarted by local"learning <br /> the same radio waves.As-a mobile user passes through"cells" curves"and"regulatory <br /> that parcel the landscape into a transmitting grid,the caller's barriers"in their efforts to break into new markets,they have <br /> connection is"parched"from one cell antenna to the next, sought powerful remedies.The CTIA petition argues that the <br /> Twenty,years later,personal communication services(PCS) supremacy clause(section 332)of the 1934 Federal <br /> have expanded to include hand-held portable phones and Communications Act authorizes preemption of state and local <br /> paging systems,and they are everywhere.A survey in the regulation of cellular tower siting.APA,in a letter to the FCC, <br /> January 1993 issue of Consumer Reports reported chat cellular expressed opposition to such preemption.In March,executive <br /> technology added an average of 7,300 users per day in 1992, director Michael Barker cold the FCC that local communities <br /> bringing the U.S. total to about 10 million.Those numbers and planners are in the best position to balance their concerns <br /> have continued to grow,reaching more than 24 million by the with the needs of the cellular industry.The National <br />