Orange County NC Website
JULES COHEN 3 ASSOCIATES, P.C. <br /> CONSULTING ENOINEEKS 37 <br /> WASHINGTON. D.C. 20036 <br /> ENGINEERING STATEMENT <br /> ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH SURVEY <br /> SPRINT CELLULAR COMPANY <br /> STATION KNKA293 <br /> CARR.BORO,NORTH CAROLINA <br /> Electromagnetic field strength measurements were made by the undersigned at the <br /> transmitting site of Domestic Public Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service station <br /> KNKA293. The measurements were made on April 28, 1994, on behalf of Sprint Cellular <br /> Company, licensee of KNKA293. Locations on the cell site grounds, both inside and outside the <br /> tower, and in the equipment shelter were surveyed to determine the levels of radio-frequency <br /> energy present. <br /> Data collected during the survey were evaluated against two standards which establish <br /> the maximum levels of radio-frequency energy to which humans may be exposed without known <br /> harmful biological effects. The two standards are American National Standards Institute (ANSI) <br /> C95.1-1982 and ANSI/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) C95.1-1992. <br /> ANSWEEE C95.1-1992 is the revision of C95.1-1982. The protection guide levels specified in <br /> ANSI C95.1-1982 have been adopted by the Federal Communications Commission as the <br /> acceptable levels of human exposure to RFR. The FCC currently is considering adoption of the <br /> revised standard and most likely will do so in the next twelve months. By evaluating the survey <br /> data against both.the existing and revised standards, there should be no need to repeat the survey <br /> effort at such time as the FCC adopts the revised standard. <br /> Survey measurements were made at representative locations on the ground at the cell <br /> site, both=a&and outside the tower fence, and inside the equipment shelter. The exposure level <br /> at each location surveyed was below the sensitivity threshold of the measurement instrument and <br /> well below the exposure limits established by either standard. Further discussion of the survey <br /> follows. <br />