Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-03-1996 - VIII-G
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 09-03-1996
>
Agenda - 09-03-1996 - VIII-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2013 3:12:05 PM
Creation date
10/30/2013 3:11:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/3/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-G
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19960903
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
NS ORD-1996-033 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments - Telecommunication Towers
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 1990-1999\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JULES COHEN 3 ASSOCIATES, P.C. <br /> CoNSULTImG EYGm. Ens 41 <br /> WASHINGTON. D.C. 20036 <br /> Engineering Statement Page 5 <br /> Carrboro, North Carolina <br /> Measurement data provided by the electromagnetic monitor were recorded by a <br /> Holaday, model M-3320,data logger. The data logger input was calibrated to the electromagnetic <br /> monitor output to record data-in units of equivalent plane wave power density, milliwatts per <br /> square centimeter. The data logger was programmed to sample the meter output once each <br /> second. Data were logged for 20-second sample periods and, at the end of each sample period, <br /> the average equivalent plane wave power density encountered over the course of the sample period <br /> would have been calculated had the exposure levels been above the sensitivity threshold of the <br /> instrument. Then, the calculated average and measured minimum and maximum power density <br /> levels for each sample period would have been stored in the data logger memory for later analysis. <br /> The extremely low maximum exposure levels present at the site made rigorous analysis of the <br /> measurement data unnecessary. <br /> On the ground and inside the equipment shelter, the probe was scanned slowly in a <br /> vertical plane over an approximate ono-square-meter area to simulate the surface of a human torso. <br /> At tight locations inside equipment racks containing cellular transmitters, filters, and combiners, <br /> and near transmission lines, there was not enough space to make whole body measurements. <br /> These locations simply were probed to ascertain the electromagnetic field strength present <br /> Findings <br /> The exposure level present at each.survey location was below the sensitivity threshold <br /> of the electraaagic monitor. Thus, exposure at the site inside the tower fence and equipment <br /> shelter is lee dm 0.17 paces of the MPE for controlled environments, the sensitivity threshold <br /> of the insa=ieet for eoa toEW environments. At publicly accessible locations, exposure was less <br /> the 0.86 peeomt of the WE for uncontrolled environments, the sensitivity threshold of the <br /> instrument for uncontrolled environments. Because of the extremely low electromagnetic field <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.