Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-28-1996 - C2(a)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 05-28-1996
>
Agenda - 05-28-1996 - C2(a)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2013 12:02:52 PM
Creation date
10/24/2013 12:02:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/28/1996
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C 2a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19960528
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.3 <br /> Flexibility of Development <br /> Landowners traditionally cherish the ability to develop their land as they see fit. <br /> Today, most landowners recognize the need for community standards -- or <br /> regulation -- of development, because the actions of one neighbor can have a large <br /> impact on others. <br /> The list of permitted land uses in an area may provide more flexibility than a <br /> community wants, or may restrict other uses that seem desirable. For example, in <br /> the Stoney Creek Basin, the areas zoned R-1 permit construction of a large country <br /> club or government office building, and, with a special-use permit, an airport, <br /> sewage treatment plant, or land fill. But the ability to build an open-space, cluster- <br /> style development is limited. Current law also does not allow landowners to use the <br /> incentives and design guidelines in some of the large-lot options recommended by <br /> the Rural Character Study Committee. <br /> Stoney Creek Basin landowners should be able to choose from a variety of <br /> development options that are consistent with good land stewardship, community <br /> health standards, and Rural Character design guidelines. Offering landowners <br /> constructive alternatives to meet these objectives is better than forcing them into a <br /> very narrow range of options. <br /> Recommendations <br /> • Preserve the density permitted under current zoning and public health standards, <br /> i.e., the density based on a yield plan for the land; <br /> • Provide an array of flexible development options that will encourage landowners <br /> to preserve open space and rural character such as those in the Rural Character <br /> Study and Randall Arendt's open space development plans; . <br /> • Consider some of the creative tools available to direct dense development into <br /> urban growth,areas rather than beyond and to create incentives for landowners <br /> and developers to preserve some undeveloped open land in the majority of the <br /> Stoney Creek Basin which is beyond current urban growth boundaries. Tools <br /> that can be considered within Orange county's jurisdiction include density <br /> bonuses and penalties, speedy approval processes, adjustments to requirements <br /> for private roads, adjustments to rules about sharing and placement of septic <br /> 9 <br /> .......}......i.i.i.i.:.^.i'.:.:.:::.:::.::..:'.:i.:i.:i.:i.:}.:i.:i.:".:.ti:.:?.:.:..::.:i.:i.::.i:.J:.:i.:.i:l....:.:.:.:.:.^:.:'.•:i.:i.:i.:i.:?.:i.:i.:i.:i.:i.::.::.::.::.::.:'..:i.:i.:i.:i.:i.:i.:i.:i..:.^.:i.i...:..^.:i.:i.::.:::.:.•i..:i.:i.}:.}..:}.:i.:i.:.:".:.":.:..v..:.:.:::•i:.:i::i...:i.:i:.:i..:i..:i.:::.:i.::.:.:.:.•:i.::.^:.:i.:i..i.:..i.i.:i.:i.:i.:i..i.i.:i.:i.:i.:i.i.}.:'.::..:}.::.::.:...ii.i.i.i.i.:i.:'.::.•:.:.::.:.i.:i.::.::.::.n:.:}.:•.::.r:.::.::.{:..}.:'.!:.S:.:: <br /> ::::............................ :.::.: ...::v::::::: :::: ii <br /> . .:::...f....:i..:J.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.