Browse
Search
NSN ORD-1996-010 Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments - Flexible Development-Open Space Proposal
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1990-1999
>
1996
>
NSN ORD-1996-010 Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments - Flexible Development-Open Space Proposal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2013 12:22:19 PM
Creation date
10/23/2013 1:57:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
IX-A
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-01-1996 - IX-A
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1996\Agenda - 05-01-1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Board Decision: That the incentives included in the Flexible <br /> Development proposal be retained, at least for the first year to determine <br /> their effectiveness. Vote: 8-3. <br /> 12. Village option. The specific issue is whether to hold another public <br /> hearing on the Village option, since it is complicated and has not <br /> received a lot of attention. <br /> Planning Board Decision: That the Village Option be removed from the <br /> Flexible Development proposal, be elaborated on, and be sent back to public <br /> hearing as soon as possible. Vote: 6-5. <br /> 13. Conservation easement credit. The specific issue is whether land <br /> protected through a conservation easement prior to development <br /> application can be counted toward satisfying the open space <br /> requirement. <br /> Planning-Board Decision: That conservation easements, the terms of which <br /> are consistent with the Flexible Development guidelines in effect at that time, <br /> be allowed to count as credit toward open space. Vote: 9-2. <br /> 14. Minor subdivision applicability. The specific issue is whether to make <br /> Minor Subdivisions subject to the Flexible Development standards. <br /> Planning Board Decision: That the Flexible Development requirements not <br /> apply to minor subdivisions but that applicants be encouraged by staff to use <br /> the options in the submission of the single required plat. Vote: 8-1. <br /> 15. Consistency with goals. The specific issue is whether the Flexible <br /> Development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of rural <br /> character preservation. <br /> No decision- discussion only. <br /> REPORT- BOARD OF COMNIISSIONERS 3/6/96 MEETING: At its March <br /> 6, 1996 meeting,the Board of Commissioners offered the following comments. Staff <br /> comments are provided in(italics). <br /> • Yield Plan: A`yield plan'may not be necessary if a developer is not planning to <br /> maximize the number of lots in a subdivision. <br /> Staff agrees <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.