Orange County NC Website
1 transition area or utility service area. He indicated that page 37 of this proposal states that "Systems are <br /> 2 permitted only in accordance with applicable water and sewer, and land use policies...." <br /> 3 <br /> 4 There was a question concerning whether the groundwater study initiated by the Water Resources <br /> 5 Committee would give information about adequate groundwater capacity. Commissioner Gordon stated that <br /> 6 the study being conducted by USGS is somewhat generalized and will not give data about specific sites. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Commissioner Crowther thanked Marvin Collins for working on the neighborhood public meetings. <br /> 9 He felt that the wording was appropriate. He asked if the County had received any conservation easements. <br /> 10 Marvin indicated that the County had not received a conservation easement but it is being worked on now. <br /> 11 Commissioner Crowther asked how the median income is established for affordable housing. Marvin Collins <br /> 12 indicated that HUD establishes that figure based on local figures which are updated annually. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Chair Carey asked why a provision was being added to count land already dedicated under <br /> 15 conservation easement as open space. Marvin Collins stated that it is counted as open space only if it <br /> 16 remains in the ownership of the person developing the property. If it is subdivided it could not be counted. <br /> 17 The assumption is that if a piece of property has something significant enough on it to lead to the approval of <br /> 18 the conservation easement, then the owner should continue to be given credit for it. The further assumption <br /> 19 is that this is fair because they have already limited the amount of development that can occur on that <br /> 20 property. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Chair Carey supported the idea that developers who create affordable housing projects could <br /> 23 submit only one plan. He asked if the provision under discussion could enforce that. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Geof Gledhill referred to page 45 of the proposal. He mentioned that the second bullet"In lieu of a <br /> 26 three-part Concept Plan, one Concept Plan may be submitted if' is being recommended for deletion. This is <br /> 27 because of the staff's recommendation, following the Planning Board's vote, not to exempt affordable <br /> 28 housing projects from the requirement to submit a Flexible Development Option. Geof Gledhill suggested not <br /> 29 including an exception to the requirement to submit a Flexible Development Option until after the Ordinance <br /> 30 is revised to require review of those projects after the plat is required. He then referred to pages 42 and 43 <br /> 31 where affordable housing was also discussed. He recommended that Page 42, G.2, 1 st paragraph be <br /> 32 changed to read "A density increase is permitted, pursuant to Section 6.28 of the Zoning Ordinance". He <br /> 33 suggested that developers interested in affordable housing be required to go to the Zoning Regulations which <br /> 34 will explain how affordable housing can be accomplished with density bonuses. At the time the Zoning <br /> 35 Regulations were adopted not all of Orange County was zoned. That might have explained the necessity of <br /> 36 having affordable housing provisions in the Subdivision Regulations. The County is now entirely zoned and <br /> 37 the Zoning Ordinances applies throughout the County. He also commented that there may be questions <br /> 38 about whether the provisions do what the Board of Commissioners want. Further consideration of them in <br /> 39 the future could be accomplished. However, his current recommendation is to leave out the reference to <br /> 40 affordable housing. Page 43, G.3 should be changed to read "Location of open space bonus units only: <br /> 41 Density increases as permitted above to encourage additional open space are limited to flexible development <br /> 42 proposed in the following locations......" <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Commissioner Gordon questioned whether the Board of Commissioners wanted to follow Mr. <br /> 45 Gledhill's recommendation. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Gordon, to <br /> 48 adopt the County Attorney's recommendation to change the language as stated above. <br /> 49 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Commissioner Willhoit mentioned his desire for a mechanism which would require that housing <br /> 52 which is approved as "affordable housing"stay affordable. He referred this to the staff and Planning Board <br /> 53 for recommendation to this Board. <br /> 54 <br />