Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-01-1996 - IX-E
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 05-01-1996
>
Agenda - 05-01-1996 - IX-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2013 12:18:24 PM
Creation date
10/23/2013 12:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-E
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19960501
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
28 <br /> All towers within the applicable radius must be identified. A thorough <br /> and detailed explanation as to why co-location efforts were not <br /> successful is required only for the towers located within the functional <br /> range. <br /> Sharing Space on New Towers <br /> The Zoning Ordinance now requires that the applicant submit a statement <br /> indicating that that the proposed tower can support at least one additional use <br /> and that the applicant is willing to lease space on the tower to another user at a <br /> reasonable rate. <br /> The proposal presented at public hearing required that that letters be sent to all <br /> potential users, offering to share space on the tower and requesting a response. <br /> Potential users would have an opportunity to respond and express their interest in <br /> leasing space. <br /> Questions were raised regarding who would be notified,what to do in the case of <br /> no responses, or many responses, and the potential for unfair competitive <br /> advantage for those who do not have a tower network already in place. Also <br /> questioned was the need for this notification requirement. It was thought that <br /> these provisions were duplicative, since any future applicants would be required <br /> to identify, and explore the possibility of locating on, all existing towers within <br /> the range of the equipment prior to submitting an application. When others <br /> apply, they will have already explored possibilities of co-locating, and those <br /> efforts would have been documented as described above. Refusal of any user <br /> to share a tower without a valid reason would become apparent during this <br /> process and could be a factor in actions on additional tower requests by that <br /> provider. This would be an incentive to work with other providers <br /> The purpose of the provisions discussed above is to assure that existing towers <br /> will be utilized to the greatest possible extent before new towers are <br /> constructed. The Planning Staff agrees that the notification requirements for the <br /> purpose of offering to lease space is duplicative, and finds that the existing <br /> provisions, which require that the tower be designed to support an additional <br /> user, and that the Special Use Permit include a statement indicating the <br /> applicant's willingness to lease space on the tower, are sufficient. <br /> 2. Subdivision Requirement <br /> A lot to be used as a tower site which is created through the subdivision <br /> process must generally be 1 or 2 acres in size, depending on the zoning district, <br /> must be accessed by a right-of-way or easement at least 50 feet in width, and <br /> must meet other requirements of the zoning ordinance and subdivision <br /> regulations in much the same manner as lot proposed for residential use. One <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.