Orange County NC Website
B. CONTRACT _ORANGE COUNTY SPEEDWAY <br /> In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon, EMS Administrative Director Janette <br /> Smith indicated that the $12,500 contract amount covers all expenses. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br /> approve a contract between Orange County Speedway and Orange County Department of Emergency <br /> Management to provide medical coverage for events and races held at the Speedway and authorize the <br /> Chair to sign on behalf of the Board, subject to review by the County Attorney. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> IX. ITEMS FOR DECISION - REGULAR AGENDA <br /> A. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT_ARTICLE 6.23.11 <br /> WATERSHED PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICTS <br /> Planner Jim Hinkley summarized this item. This proposed amendment would authorize <br /> the Board of Adjustment to grant variances to allow the use of septic easements in watersupply <br /> watersheds for lots created before January 1, 1994. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br /> approve this amendment for lots created before January 1, 1994. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> B. Z-1-96 SCHLEY COMMUNITY STORE AND FLEA MARKET -ZONING ATLAS <br /> AMENDMENT <br /> Planner Jim Hinkley presented information about the community store which has been in <br /> operation for 30 years. This request is for a rezoning from AR Agricultural Residential to EC-5 Existing <br /> Commercial. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br /> approve the rezoning for a .82 acre lot from AR to EC-5 in Cedar Grove Township. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> C. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENT_DEDICATION_PAYMENT-IN- <br /> LIEU <br /> Planning Director Marvin Collins presented for the Board's consideration proposed <br /> amendments to the dedication/payment-in-lieu provisions of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. <br /> The specific proposal is to amend Section IV-B-7-b, Recreation Sites, of the Subdivision Regulations to <br /> substitute a payment-in-lieu based on the cost of land and facilities associated with implementing a <br /> system of community and district parks. Currently, the payment-in-lieu includes only the value of land, <br /> and is based on the assessed value listed in the Orange County Tax Office. The average payment-in- <br /> lieu per household is presently$76. Under the proposed system, the payment-in-lieu would not exceed <br /> $455 per household. In addition to the payment-in-lieu, a change in the amount of land which must be <br /> dedicated for recreation sites is also proposed as outlined in the agenda. <br /> The Recreation & Parks Advisory Council recommends the service area approach. They <br /> also recommend that the land dedication requirement be set no lower than 1/57th of an acre per lot. The <br /> Planning Board voted 8-2 to table this item. They felt that if the payment-in-lieu proposal was to be an <br /> "interim" payment until the Master Recreation Plan was updated, it would be better to wait until the <br /> update was accomplished. The Administration recommends that the payment-in-lieu be set no higher <br /> than $455 per dwelling lot and that the land dedication required be set no lower than 1/57th of an acre. <br /> Marvin Collins explained the rationale for reducing the acreage from 1/35 of an acre to <br /> 1/57 of an acre. He said that when the payment-in-lieu was considered in the late 80's the County did <br /> not have a master recreation and parks plan. They used standards put out by the National Recreation <br /> and Parks Association which set the acreage at 1/35 of an acre. When the Recreation and Parks Plan <br /> was done and adopted by the Board,two kinds of parks were included - community parks and district <br /> parks. When these standards are combined, it comes out to 1157 of an acre. <br /> In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon about updating the fees, Marvin <br /> Collins indicated that these can be reviewed as part of the budget process. <br />