Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1996 - IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 04-01-1996
>
Agenda - 04-01-1996 - IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2013 12:55:15 PM
Creation date
10/22/2013 12:55:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-C
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19960401
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 18, 1996 Planning Board Minutes 6 <br /> (3) Article 23 Violations,Penalties,&Remedies <br /> Presentation by Jim Hinkley. <br /> The Orange County Zoning Ordinance provides for action which may be taken by <br /> the County to abate zoning violations or non-compliance with zoning <br /> requirements. Taking criminal action in the courts is not often used,but when it <br /> is,it is important that this remedy be effective. Although not specifically stated in <br /> Section 23.2,the maximum fine is fifty dollar($50.00). The maximum$50-fine <br /> upon conviction limits the effectiveness of the criminal action remedy. <br /> The proposed amendment would enable Orange County to increase the maximum <br /> fine to$500.00,as authorized by NC General Statute 14-4. <br /> The proposed amendment was presented at public hearing on February 26, 1996. <br /> No citizen comments were received.The proposed amendment was referred to the <br /> Planning Board for recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners <br /> no sooner than April 1, 1996. <br /> The Zoning Officer recommends approval of the proposed text amendment to <br /> Article 23. Violations,Penalties,and Remedies, Section 23.2 Penalties, <br /> a)Criminal Action. <br /> In response to a question about an example of a court case, Hinkley referred to a <br /> case from January, 1996. The County won the case;however,the fine was$50.00 <br /> and the court costs were$62.00. The following month,the citizen was again in <br /> violation. Discussion indicated that the fine was so minimal that it apparently did <br /> not really concern the violator. Hinkley continued that the Judge had suggested to <br /> him that it be recommended to the County Commissioners to raise the penalty to <br /> $500.00 as allowed by the General Statutes. <br /> Katz asked how often the County has been involved in criminal action such as <br /> this. Hinkley responded that there have been three or four criminal cases in the <br /> last six years. <br /> MOTION: Waddell moved approval as recommended by the Zoning Officer. Seconded by <br /> Allison. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> d. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> (1) Recreation/Dedication Payment-In-Lieu Provisions <br /> Presentation by Marvin Collins. <br /> (A copy of the agenda abstract information is an attachment to these minutes on <br /> pages ) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.