Browse
Search
ORD-2013-036 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #2-A and Upper Neuse River Basin Assoc. Funding Request
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2013
>
ORD-2013-036 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #2-A and Upper Neuse River Basin Assoc. Funding Request
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 9:01:18 AM
Creation date
10/16/2013 2:37:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/15/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
5f
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-15-2013 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 10-15-2013 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 10-15-2013
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A. Instructions for Preliminary, Screening-Level Cost Estimates and 4 <br /> Schedules <br /> The information you should use to develop your preliminary, screening-level cost estimates and schedules are provided <br /> below. The UNRBA technical steering committee does not expect those firms invited to provide qualifications to conduct <br /> an extensive project planning analysis as part of the qualifications package. The committee is requesting the development <br /> of preliminary, screening-level estimates using a minimum level of effort. However, these estimates should have some <br /> basis in how the firm will approach the task. That basis should be included as a 1-paragraph description with each upper <br /> and lower level estimate. Estimated costs maybe presented with a±10% contingency to reflect a higher level of <br /> confidence, and a f 15% contingency to reflect a lower level of confidence. Using the list of the 5 submittal components, <br /> information under item 5 should address the following: <br /> 5.a. Credit Development <br /> Low end estimate: Develop nutrient credits for sixteen (16)nutrient reduction measures as listed in Table A-1. The <br /> credits will be developed using data from existing studies and located in existing publically available databases. A <br /> measure of central tendency will be the basis of the removal credit recommendation assigned to each BMP. A project <br /> database will be created for this task. Sources of data and information may include but not limited to the International <br /> Stormwater BMP Database, the National Stormwater Best Management Practices Database,NC State University BMP <br /> Databases, Chesapeake Stormwater Network,the USEPA Green Infrastructure Case Studies, and other appropriate <br /> organizations or credit development processes. <br /> Table A-l. Practices for the Low-End Credit Development Estimates <br /> Over/Under-Sized Level Spreader/Filter Check Dam Grass Swale Green Roof(revision <br /> Bioretention Strip combined with requested to existing <br /> Swale nutrient credit values) <br /> Soil Amendments Volume-based Pond Infiltration Practices Street Sweeping <br /> /Restoration Retrofits <br /> Urban Tree Canopy Permeable Pavement Pond Retrofits/Upflow Check Dam Grassed <br /> (Diversified) Filter Swales <br /> Bio-Swales Filter Strips with Toe Leaf Litter Recovery Improved Rainwater <br /> Trenches Harvesting <br /> High end estimate: Similar to the low end estimate, develop recommended nutrient credits for fifty-five (55)nutrient <br /> reduction measures as listed in Table A-2. Credits will be developed using data from existing studies and located in <br /> publically available databases. Instead of a measure of central tendency as the basis for assigning credit, the service <br /> provider would be expected to use an analysis of the distribution of reported removal efficiencies to incorporate <br /> uncertainty and variability into the removal efficiencies. <br /> Table A-2. Practices for the High-End Credit Development Estimates <br /> Over/Under-Sized Level Spreader/filter Permeable Pavement Infiltration devices/ Flood plain <br /> Bioretention Strip combined with (Diversified) basins: permeable restoration <br /> Swale walkways,planters, <br /> infiltration trenches <br /> (Refine) <br /> Soil Amendments Pond Retrofits/ Check Dam Grassed Bio-Swales Filter Strips with <br /> /Restoration U flow Filter Swales Toe Trenches <br /> Leaf Litter Recovery Urban stream Riparian buffer Catch basin inserts Blue Roof <br /> restoration restoration(50-feet and vortex <br /> wide buffers) separators <br /> Constructed Sand filters Peak flow control Proprietary devices Impoundment of <br /> wetlands with for water quality urban,degraded <br /> various designs credits streams <br /> Enhancing or Land or forest Riparian buffer Increase tree canopy Cattle exclusion, <br /> repairing existing protection restoration with with and without <br /> riparian buffers varying width buffers <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.