Agenda - 10-17-2013 - 1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

29 Once annexation concerns are addressed one source of funds for these extensions could be proceeds from a sale of the Greene tract. Should the decision be made to sell this property - proceeds could be used for any statutorily authorized purpose. SUBSIDIZING THE COST OF CONNECTING HOMES TO EXTENDED SEWER LINES The Town attorneys and I are in agreement that the County and Towns have limited statutory authority to pay for or subsidize connection costs. Additionally, without adequate upgrades connecting older home plumbing systems to modem water and sewer systems could result in internal damages to the connected structure. This represents a substantial exposure of liability to the County and Towns. For that reason the Town attorneys and I are in agreement that direct connections to the system should not.-be provided by the County or Towns. NCGS 153A -376 authorizes counties to engage in health and welfare programs for the benefit of low and moderate income persons. Pursuant to this authority a program could be established whereby grants or loans are issued to persons who meet designated criteria to assist those persons with paying' the costs of connecting to a water or sewer system. The qualifying criteria- would apply county -wide and could not be limited to residents of the Neighborhood. So if an individual with access to a sewer line in Efland or Mebane met the criteria they also could participate in the program. A program of this nature would not work to connect every home to 'a sewer system but it would be legally defensible. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS OF A NEIGHBORHOOD- COMMUNITY CENTER The current proposal appears to be that the County and /or Towns pay Habitat for Humanity ( "Habitat ") approximately $650,000 to construct a community center ( "Center") in the Neighborhood that, once constructed, Habitat would contract with the Rogers Eubanks Neighborhood Association to operate, and the Co -unty would help fund through some master lease agreement. The Town attorneys and I concur that this method of funding the Center is not legally defensible. One method the Town attorneys and I are in agreement on is for Habitat to donate the land for the Center or lease the land to the County, the County could then, through the bidding process, bid out construction of the facility and enter into various agreements for the operation of the Center. We also agree there may be several other options for getting the Center constructed and operating. Another method that occurred to me after my meeting with the other attorneys is the possibility of a community development grant or loan. Just as with the sewer connection program discussed above through NCGS 153A -376 counties have authority to issue grants and loans. Those grants and loans may be made for the restoration or preservation of older neighborhoods. Counties may contract with corporations for carrying out this restoration or preservation of older neighborhoods, and such contracts may be for the purpose of providing recreation facilities. As it relates to the construction of the facility I believe the NO bidding statutes would still apply. Should this option be given consideration additional research would be needed to fully determine the process whereby it is accomplished. Regardless of the manner in which the Center is funded it must be open to the general public.