Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-17-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 10-17-2013 - Joint Mtg. - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
>
Agenda - 10-17-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2015 10:52:19 AM
Creation date
10/14/2013 10:06:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2013
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-17-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br />I The $900,000 that Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County agreed to pay to the <br />Landfill Fund for the 100+ acres of the Greene Tract that were not conveyed to Orange County <br />cannot be used to pay for - either the construction of a community center or the extension of sewer <br />lines to the Rogers Road area. The Green Tract was acquired using landfill funds, and the <br />$900,000 is being paid back to this enterprise fund. Such funds can only be expended to cover <br />the costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the landfill. <br />4. Proceeds from the sale of the 100+ acre portion of the Greene Tract now owned <br />jointly by OC, CB, and CH can be used in the same manner as other unrestricted general funds. <br />Thus, Carrboro could use.these funds to extend sewer lines to unnerved areas within Carrboro,s <br />corporate limits. <br />S. The towns and the county could appropriate funds to subsidize the cost of actually <br />connecting homes to a sewer line, once .that line has been constructed. In order to be able to <br />point to specific statutory authority to provide such subsidies, it would be preferable to Iimit the <br />availability of such subsidies to low and moderate in.6ome property owners. The attorneys do not <br />recommend that the contractor engaged by the county and/or the towns to extend the lines be <br />directed to construct lines connecting individual properties to the public lines because this work <br />involves actually getting into the plumbing systems within individual homes ' and poses <br />significant risks of unexpected complications and claims of damages. <br />6. The managers propose that a "County Sewer District" be created for the Rogers Road <br />area as well as. adjoining areas that do not have sewer, and that the district use the special <br />assessment process to recoup some of the costs of extending sewer service to these areas_ <br />Presumably, the proposal is referring to a County Water and Sewer District created pursuant to <br />Article 6 of CT.S. Chapter 162A. Such a district would be a legally separate municipal <br />corporation, but the governing body of the district would be the Orange County Board of <br />Commissioners. Such a district could issue its own bonds to raise the capital to cover the cost of <br />extending the lines. Assessments could be based on various criteria listed in G.S. 153A -186„ <br />including "the area of land served ... at an equal rate per unit of area," which would mean that <br />Properties with greater development or redevelopment potential would pay more than .smaller <br />properties, but the statute does not provide a way to exempt from the assessments specific <br />properties based on criteria not listed in the statute. Thus, if the objective is to extend sewer lines <br />at little or no cost to the longstanding owners of properties in the Rogers Road area, but to <br />recapture some of the cost of extending the lines when properties in this area are developed or <br />redeveloped, the special assessment process appears to be a useful tool. <br />An alternative might be to establish. the District and have the District issue its bonds to <br />raise the cost of extending the lines. Carrboro could contract with the District to pay for the cost <br />of extending the lines to serve properties that are within the town. The District would contract <br />with OWASA to operate and maintain the lines and to bill the customers in the same manner as <br />other OWASA customers. (An amendment to the WSNIPBA would probably be needed). Then <br />the District could establish a fee — call it a service line extension fee — that would be designed to <br />recoup some of the costs incurred by the District in extending the lines. (OWASA has an <br />"availability fee" that is designed to recoup the cost of the treatment plant and major outfalls, but <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.