Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-17-2013 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 10-17-2013 - Joint Mtg. - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
>
Agenda - 10-17-2013 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2015 10:52:19 AM
Creation date
10/14/2013 10:06:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2013
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-17-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />Force considered. One was a larger district including other properties outside of Rogers <br />Road that can contribute to the cost that otherwise would be paid by the Rogers Road <br />area. The other option would be having Task Force recommend funding solely for the <br />2012 Sewer Concept for the Rogers Road area and that would represent a larger per - <br />property cost. <br />If a Utility District is created, it would be a separate governmental entity, so everyone <br />within that governmental entity would have the same opportunity. Even with the <br />creation of a Utility District the County would be responsible for funding and operating <br />the district. The district could issue bonds to raise the funds, or more likely, the County <br />would issue some sort of General Obligation Bond. There are several legal ways to <br />raise the money; it will come down to the political choice of which legal way the County <br />would choose. Either way, the County would take the lead to finance a Utility District. <br />A Utility District would be located outside the corporate limits of the Town of Chapel <br />Hill. A legal concern is whether the Town of Chapel Hill could spend money outside of <br />the town limits. There are a couple of potential ways under which that could occur. The <br />first option is that Chapel Hill could annex either all or some of that district. In order to <br />do so it would require a majority vote of the residents. The second option allows the <br />extension of water and sewer lines through a community development program. The <br />extension of utility lines can occur within a Town's corporate limits but also within the <br />ETJ [Extraterritorial Planning Jurisdiction]. The district could be created, but there is no <br />basis for the Town of Chapel Hill to be able to make a contribution, in the absence of <br />either a community development program in the ETJ or annexation. The County can <br />create a service district. Carrboro can contribute because it has areas in the service <br />district that are within the town limits, but Chapel Hill does not. <br />On November 14, 2012 the Historic Rogers Road Task Force recommended that the <br />County & Town Managers explore the creation of a County Sewer District for all <br />property owners in the Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood. This concept evolved from <br />2012 Sewer concept presented by OWASA, with the total cost of about $5.8 million that <br />would serve 86 parcels, with an average cost of $67,000 per parcel. The Task Force <br />asked the Managers to look at water and sewer options and see what might work, what <br />might be a better solution or was the best solution. <br />The planning staffs from Carrboro and Chapel Hill looked at the sewer district and <br />identified areas that the sewer lines go through that aren't being served by the proposed <br />sewer. Staff identified parcels that could be served by new sewer infrastructure but also <br />considered parcels that are not served by water. Consideration for a Proposed Utility <br />District started with the boundaries of Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood. Adjacent <br />properties that fell into the category of either existing development that was not currently <br />FA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.