Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-15-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 10-15-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 10-15-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2015 10:10:17 AM
Creation date
10/14/2013 9:00:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/15/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-15-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> 1 Commissioner Price agreed with these two items. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 • Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda <br /> 4 <br /> 5 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to approve the <br /> 6 remaining items on the consent agenda. <br /> 7 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 8 <br /> 9 • Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda <br /> 10 <br /> 11 g, FY 2013-14 Budget Amendment #1-D — Approval of Two (2.0 FTE) New Appraiser I Positions <br /> 12 within the Revaluation Fund <br /> 13 The Board considered approval of Budget Amendment#1-D by approving two (2.0 FTE) additional <br /> 14 Appraiser I positions within the Revaluation Fund as part of the cyclical North Carolina revaluation process, <br /> 15 and an appropriation from the Revaluation Fund's Unassigned Fund Balance to cover the FY 2013-14 <br /> 16 costs. <br /> 17 Commissioner Gordon said her concerns have to do with the process. She feels the Board has <br /> 18 been very careful about adding positions outside of the budget process. She is concerned about adding <br /> 19 permanent full time positions outside of the budget process. She would prefer that these be time limited <br /> 20 positions for two years, which would give the board time to consider these positions in the context of the <br /> 21 budget process. <br /> 22 Dwane Brinson said this was part of his presentation back in May, in reference to the revaluation in <br /> 23 2017. He said this process simply swapping contract services for in-house full time employee positions. <br /> 24 He said this allows for greater quality control and accurate record keeping. He said the County is going <br /> 25 back to a 4 year revaluation cycle after 2017. <br /> 26 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that the Board voted to push back revaluation two years. He asked <br /> 27 if these two positions would have been needed if the Board had not pushed this back. <br /> 28 Dwane Brinson said no. He said the 2015 revaluation would have been a different revaluation and <br /> 29 the 2017 one will be better. <br /> 30 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the 2017 would be more comprehensive, and Dwane Brinson said <br /> 31 yes. <br /> 32 Commissioner Dorosin asked if these new staff members will begin working on this revaluation right <br /> 33 away. <br /> 34 Dwane Brinson said there have already been planning sessions to move forward. He said once <br /> 35 these positions are on board, assignments will be given, and revaluations will move forward. He said that <br /> 36 once these two new appraisers are on staff, every area and neighborhood in the County will have an <br /> 37 assigned appraiser. <br /> 38 Commissioner Gordon asked why this wasn't approved during the budget process. <br /> 39 Frank Clifton said staff developed the budget in January, and the final recommended budget came <br /> 40 in May. He said staff were doing survey work in the spring and found some significant errors. This was <br /> 41 late in the budget process and the situation was still unclear. He said staff needed to have on-site <br /> 42 verification of property structures and their sizes on an on-going basis moving forward. He noted that tax <br /> 43 refunds cannot be given for past years, but data can be corrected moving forward. He feels that taxpayers <br /> 44 deserve accurate analysis to ensure a proper baseline prior to the upcoming revaluation. He said it was <br /> 45 eventually determined that this process would require 2 more appraisers. <br /> 46 Commissioner Gordon said she is already convinced that the positions are needed; however she is <br /> 47 not convinced that the positions are needed beyond a limited time period of two years. <br /> 48 Frank Clifton said that if the positions are time limited, staff would probably come back and ask for <br /> 49 more time. He said this is because these positions will be needed going forward, as the appeal process <br /> 50 extends well beyond the evaluation. He said that these appraisers will be assigned to neighborhoods, and <br /> 51 maintaining this will prevent inaccurate or conflicting valuations within the same area. <br /> 52 Chair Jacobs verified that Dwane Brinson, as a senior staff member, was making an affirmative <br /> 53 statement that these positions are needed on a permanent, full time basis, even after the revaluations. <br /> 54 Dwane Brinson said yes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.