ORD-1999-016 Proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment Z-3-9 Ernie McBroom

Browse Search

2 • The minimum lot size is two acres. • Permitted uses include agricultural activities, single family dwellings, duplexes on twice the minimum lot size, and those uses which are supportive of residential development such as churches, fire stations, utilities, etc. • The NCDOT 1995 average daily traffic count was 800 for Sawmill Road at the intersection of NC 86. Proposed: The proposed zoning lot meets the 2-acre minimum lot size. A 12 percent (12%) impervious surface limitation for non-residential uses in the watershed would be imposed. BMP (Best Management Practices) would not be allowed to satisfy watershed requirements. • The proposed zoning for the 10.01a site is AS(LITTLE-PW) Agricultural Service (Little River Protected Watershed). • Minimum lot size is two acres. • Permitted use includes rural non-farm, non-residential development which supports the horticultural, silvicultural, and agricultural uses of AR districts as listed in the attached General Information Memorandum to the Board of County Commissioners. Development Processes. Schedule, and Action • Public Hearing August 23, 1999: The proposed zoning atlas amendment was referred to the Planning Board for recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners no sooner than September 21, 1999. Please refer to the minutes of the public hearing attached to this abstract. • First Action: Planning Board Recommendation: The Planning Board considered the matter at its regular meeting of September 1, 1999. After considerable discussion and 1estimony� from representatives of the community, the vote was 3 yeas and 3 nays. Therefore, the proposal is forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with no recommendation. Please refer to minutes of the September 1, 1999, Planning Board meeting attached to this abstract. • Final Action: The Board of County Commissioners shall not consider enactment of the proposed amendment until sixty days after the first date of the public hearing or until the Planning Board makes this recommendation, whichever comes first. In making its decision, the Board of Commissioners shall consider all relevant evidence presented at the joint public hearing, and any new evidence which was considered by the Planning Board in making its recommendation. New evidence which was not presented in writing to the Planning Board may not be considered by the Board of Commissioners in making a decision unless the joint public hearing is reopened to receive said evidence, and the item is re-advertised and/or referred back to the Planning Board for recommendation.