Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-26-1996 - IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 06-26-1996
>
Agenda - 06-26-1996 - IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2013 4:37:11 PM
Creation date
9/18/2013 4:37:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19960626
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> organic material such as unmarketable paper, yard waste and <br /> food wastes (see attachment 2) . <br /> We believe that the materials recovery facility is a cornerstone of <br /> this system and work on it should begin early, if this system is <br /> adopted. The composting facility does not necessarily need to be <br /> constructed early in the process to handle either yard waste or <br /> residual paper from the materials recovery facility. Yard waste is <br /> now adequately handled through the mulching process at the <br /> landfill. Residual mixed paper may have other markets as both <br /> sorting technology and end-use markets improve. <br /> Implementing the Plan and Reorganization of Solid Waste Management <br /> The Owners Group recommended proceeding with plan implementation <br /> prior to finalizing the structure and functions of the solid waste <br /> management reorganization. I forwarded a memorandum concerning the <br /> reorganization process to all governing board members last week. <br /> The proposed timetable calls for development of an agency by <br /> January 1997 with implementation by July, 1997. While proceeding <br /> with the plan absent a new governing structure is theoretically <br /> possible, it would require considerable ongoing coordipation of <br /> waste reduction activities by each government to ensure that the <br /> solid waste plan remains integrated. <br /> Discussion <br /> Owners Group member governments will need to make at least three <br /> key decisions in order to proceed with implementation of an <br /> integrated solid waste management plan. These decisions are only <br /> the first steps towards plan implementation. WESTON"s final report <br /> chapter 5 on plan implementation guidance details many of the types <br /> of decisions that must occur in order to fully implement the plan. <br /> This section reviews the first set of key decisions and presents <br /> some advantages and disadvantages of each approach. <br /> 1. Decide on the structure of the overall integrated solid waste <br /> system as presented above and make any desired changes. <br /> 2. Select between unit-based pricing and collection bans <br /> (mandatory recycling) coupled with differential landfill fees <br /> as the main mixed solid waste prevention strategy. <br /> The WESTON study considered implementation of all five prevention <br /> measures listed above. The Owners Group recommended implementation <br /> of public education and non-economic incentives. They requested <br /> that the member governments select either a unit-based pricing <br /> system or a collection ban (mandatory recycling) system plus <br /> differential landfill fees. Either of these strategies would <br /> accompany public education as the primary waste prevention <br /> measures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.