Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-26-1996 - IX-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
Agenda - 06-26-1996
>
Agenda - 06-26-1996 - IX-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2013 4:34:34 PM
Creation date
9/18/2013 4:34:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/1996
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19960626
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> 4 <br /> As an affordable housing developer, we are caught in the middle, wanting to win an <br /> allocation of State tax credits for affordable housing in Carrboro and wanting to comply <br /> with Town, County, and OWASA "off-site" requirements, but knowing that these <br /> requirements collectively create an "off-site" cost burden which makes this and any future <br /> application for affordable housing in Orange County only marginally feasible, and at a <br /> competitive disadvantage relative to other tax credit applications from other communities in <br /> North Carolina. <br /> LINKAGE OF AFFORDABLE SENIORS APARTMENTS TO THE SCHOOL IMPACT FEE <br /> First Centrum Corporation is not questioning the authority of Orange County, OWASA, or <br /> the Town of Carrboro to require new development to help pay for the cost of additional <br /> services required by such new development. But, as a developer of affordable housing, we <br /> are asking each entity to consider that a requirement on an "across the board" basis, or the <br /> levying of a flat fee, regardless of the affordability of the housing being proposed and <br /> regardless of the actual impact of the proposed development on a particular service, while <br /> unquestionably intended to be a rational and efficient method of funding particular <br /> services, may have the unintended effect of being exclusionary to certain types of <br /> development, like affordable rental housing for seniors, that will benefit Orange County. <br /> We are asking that you take into account that one unit of affordable housing, whether <br /> owner-occupied or renter-occupied, simply cannot afford the same "off-site"cost burden <br /> that a much more expensive unit of middle-income or upper-income housing can afford. <br /> Also, please consider "for rent" affordable housing as well as "for sale" affordable housing <br /> for exemption from the school impact fee; rental housing is the most critical housing need <br /> for senior citizens. The prospective residents for affordable senior housing are usually in <br /> their 70's through 90's and are not interested in, or able to purchase, a "for sale" <br /> residence. We have explained previously that a developer of tax credit rental housing, <br /> unlike developers of market rent apartments, is generally not able to sell these apartments <br /> at a profit, so any exemption of the school impact fee stays with the property to the <br /> benefit of the low-income residents. <br /> As to a rational nexus between the proposed development and the school impact fee, it is <br /> very important to understand that, FOR AT LEAST 30 YEARS (and probably longer) the <br /> proposed Carolina Spring apartments can be legally occupied ONLY by senior citizens of <br /> age 62 and over, and will add NO CHILDREN to Orange County schools. Carolina Spring <br /> WILL annually provide fair share support to Orange County schools through payment of <br /> property taxes. It seems inappropriate, however, to First Centrum Corporation, to the <br /> Town of Carrboro, and most likely to the NCHFA, for a "senior citizens only" affordable <br /> apartment community to pay an up-front fee of $186,000 for somehow impacting schools. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.