Browse
Search
Minutes 06-06-2013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Minutes 06-06-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2013 11:18:14 AM
Creation date
9/18/2013 11:10:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/6/2013
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-06-2013 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 06-06-2013 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-06-2013 - 1-3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 06-06-2013 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
She said the partnership states that the money will bring greater economic development <br /> opportunities, but the direct benefit to Orange County is uncertain. The department is working <br /> with the partnership to gain a better understanding of this, and for now the recommended <br /> figure remains the same. <br /> Frank Clifton said this will be brought back once all of the state changes shake out. <br /> Steve Brantley said the background on the probable fee increase in membership with <br /> the Research Triangle Regional Partnership (RTRP) relates to the formula for calculating the <br /> fee for membership. He said the county pays the same as Durham and Wake County-15 <br /> cents per capita, or roughly $20,000. He said the other eleven counties pay 10 cents per <br /> capita. He said the Partnership has asked Orange County to go from 15 cents to 30 cents and <br /> has asked the other counties to triple and go from 10 cents to 30 cents. He said the entire <br /> region will have to make a decision about this and about whether to stay in the partnership or <br /> not. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier noted that staff expressed a desire to leverage tourism assets <br /> to create more business. She is curious about this objective towards business recruitment. <br /> Steve Brantley said the combination of agriculture economic development and tourism <br /> strengths can create an agri-tourism endeavor. <br /> Chair Jacobs requested periodic reports about economic development activity through <br /> either a semi-annual or annual report. <br /> Steve Brantley said he will see what can be gathered in a report, and will start providing <br /> the Board with this requested information. <br /> Chair Jacobs said his experience with RTRP has been that it is equally offensive and <br /> insensitive as it is effective. He said he would reserve judgment until he sees the proposal. <br /> Steve Brantley said there is a possibility that the State will sub out regional marketing <br /> through regional partnerships. He said this would be interesting, but nothing may be known <br /> about this for six months. <br /> Commissioner Price said she thought that Orange County paid less than Durham and <br /> Wake, and Wake has actually been subsidizing other counties. <br /> Steve Brantley said the 30 cents per capita may be currently correct for Wake and <br /> Durham. He said this is not divulged. He said that Wake County is capable of significant fund <br /> raising through companies like Red Hat, as well as banks and power companies. <br /> Frank Clifton clarified that these assessments don't necessary come from the <br /> government and often come from the Chamber of Commerce or another non- governmental <br /> agency. He said that Orange County does not have a large corporate base to pull from. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked if the County will get any more information about the <br /> benefits from the increases in this fee. <br /> Frank Clifton said this question has been asked in the face of increasing fees, but there has <br /> been no answer yet. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked if this answer will come in time to impact the budget. <br /> Frank Clifton said the money is not a significant dollar amount. He said this can be <br /> allocated later in the fiscal year out of the quarter cent sales tax fund <br /> Tonya Walton referred to the Article 46 sales cent on page 53. She said this was <br /> enacted in April of last year, and funds are allocated 50/50 between County economic <br /> development projects and the two school systems. She said the County anticipates <br /> generating $2.6 million in revenue for the upcoming year. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if the amount listed on the second page works out well in <br /> terms of allocation. <br /> Steve Brantley said the categories are appropriate for now. He said some categories <br /> may show themselves to be as active in terms of demand in the future. He said that water and <br /> sewer lines are the single area with needs right now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.