Browse
Search
Minutes 05-14-2013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Minutes 05-14-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2013 11:17:22 AM
Creation date
9/18/2013 11:00:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/14/2013
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. The operation, management, conservation, improvement, and maintenance of a farm <br /> and the structures and buildings on the farm, including building and structure repair, <br /> replacement, expansion, and construction incident to the farming operation. <br /> 6. When performed on the farm, "agriculture", "agricultural", and "farming" also include the <br /> marketing and selling of agricultural products, agri-tourism, the storage and use of <br /> materials for agricultural purposes, packing, treating, processing, sorting, storage, and <br /> other activities performed to add value to crops, livestock, and agricultural items <br /> produced on the farm, and similar activities incident to the operation of a farm. <br /> Previous ASE Effort <br /> • Previous ASE effort had 3 tiers of use intensity <br /> • Due to changes in statutes most of the "Tier 1" and some of the "Tier 2" uses are now <br /> considered exempt from zoning regulations (if being done on a bona fide farm) <br /> • Conditional zoning districts were necessary in order to implement the proposed program <br /> — `New' UDO has conditional zoning districts and more can be added <br /> • Previous effort proposed to change the County's normal public hearing process for re- <br /> zonings to the new conditional zoning district <br /> — Public hearing could be held on any BOCC regular agenda, not just at the quarterly <br /> public hearings <br /> — Recommendation from APB (Agricultural Preservation Board) and EDC (now Economic <br /> Development Advisory Board) in addition to Planning Board recommendation. <br /> • Unclear on how a public hearing would function since current process is a joint <br /> BOCC/Planning Board hearing <br /> • Rural Buffer was removed from consideration until joint planning partners could be more <br /> involved <br /> — Memo sent in 2007 by former County Manager <br /> Zoning Methods <br /> • Existing AS District (general use district) <br /> — 36.57 acres in 8 distinct areas containing approximately 20 parcels. <br /> • Existing Conditional Use method <br /> • New Conditional Zoning District <br /> • New Overlay District <br /> BOCC Direction/Input <br /> 1. Verification the BOCC wants staff to work on a comprehensive ASE project <br /> — Some of the previous work is still valid but will need to be re-worked into the new UDO <br /> — Draft ASE Manual will also need to be largely rewritten <br /> 2. Should staff pursue coordinating with joint planning partners to potentially have ASE <br /> program apply in the Rural Buffer? <br /> 3. Any Land Use categories where ASE uses should not be encouraged? <br /> 4. Direction on zoning method(s) to be brought forward. Also, should the normal rezoning <br /> process be changed for ASE projects? <br /> 5. Direction on whether staff should begin working on revising home occupation regulations <br /> or <br /> methods to reinvigorate rural activity nodes. <br /> 6. Other issues BOCC may wish to address as part of ASE <br /> Commissioner Rich asked for clarification on the General Use Districts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.