Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-17-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-17-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-17-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 3:35:36 PM
Creation date
9/13/2013 11:56:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/17/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-17-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> 1 would receive a decrease (Pre-Trial Services - $15,000); and one (1) agency's <br /> 2 funding (JOCCA-$20,000) would be eliminated. Three (3) new agencies are <br /> 3 recommended for funding. <br /> 4 - If funds are approved, one agency's funding would be administered through a <br /> 5 departmental service contract ($95,000). Two other organizations received funds <br /> 6 through this format, in FY 2012-13 ($10,000 each). <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Clarence Grier referenced a handout at the Commissioner's places, outlining the <br /> 9 decision process for the outside agencies that did not receive funding. <br /> 10 He noted that a request was received today from Piedmont Food & Agricultural <br /> 11 Processing Center (PFAP) for a funding increase. He said Tonya Walton handled most <br /> 12 of this process and she is here to answer questions. <br /> 13 Frank Clifton outlined this process for the benefit of the new Commissioners. He <br /> 14 noted that the Board of County Commissioners does make changes to these outside <br /> 15 agencies each year, and this is their prerogative. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin asked where he can find a full listing. <br /> 17 Clarence Grier said this is available on pages 209-11 in the budget book. <br /> 18 Commissioner Gordon referred to attachment B, pages 6-7. She said, a few <br /> 19 years back, the Board tried to create a more systematic approach to funding outside <br /> 20 agencies, and these guidelines were developed. She said the advisory boards also <br /> 21 provided feedback. She feels that this is a systematic and objective process, and she is <br /> 22 inclined to follow what comes out of it. <br /> 23 Commissioner Price asked when she should address it if there is a particular <br /> 24 agency she would like to see funded. <br /> 25 Chair Jacobs said this should be done now. He said nothing has to be decided <br /> 26 tonight, but this is a good time to inform the Commissioners of thoughts and opinions. <br /> 27 Commissioner Price said she would like for the Board to consider funding the <br /> 28 Jackson Center and Voices Together, even if it is not for the full requested amount. <br /> 29 Commissioner McKee seconded Commissioner Price's opinion on the Voices <br /> 30 Together program. He said he has observed this program and feels it should receive <br /> 31 some funding. He said the participant number is low but the impact is big. <br /> 32 Commissioner Pelissier said Voices Together is a good program; however she <br /> 33 feels there is a counterpoint to be made. She said the criteria for funding states that if <br /> 34 non-profit is fully funded by the county government then it should be part of government, <br /> 35 rather than a non—profit. She said that even if full funding is not given, most of this <br /> 36 program's funding still comes from the County, and she thinks that the schools should <br /> 37 help fund this program. <br /> 38 Commissioner Dorosin referred to page 211 and said the information seems <br /> 39 misleading. He thinks many of these organizations have applied before and didn't get <br /> 40 funding. This is information he would be interested in knowing. <br /> 41 Commissioner Price noted the recommendation is to give Habitat for Humanity <br /> 42 half of what was requested. She asked if their application is available for review. <br /> 43 Chair Jacobs said this is available on the disk provided. <br /> 44 Chair Jacobs said Habitat for Humanity is addressing 10 or 15 houses for that <br /> 45 amount of money. He referred to pages 164 and 167, and said he has been a big <br /> 46 supporter of the Urgent Home Repair Fund. He said this program is spending $65,000 <br /> 47 on administration and $68,000 for the repairs and is only doing 20 homes. He <br /> 48 questioned, if Habitat is doing the same program, why the County is doing it too; and he <br /> 49 questioned the amount being spent on administration. He noted that both are designed <br /> 50 to assist homes in getting up to code. He suggested a comparison of both programs to <br /> 51 see if a partnership would be cost effective. <br /> 52 Frank Clifton said he believes the Urgent Home Repair Fund is a federally <br /> 53 funded program and most of the administration costs are incurred in complying with the <br /> 54 grant requirements. He said this is a brand new program for Habitat and the <br /> 55 effectiveness is still being evaluated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.