Agenda - 09-17-2013 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5 1 Chair Jacobs asked what happened to the library services task force and if the Board 2 should strike this from the books if there is no place for it in the planning process. 3 4 Lucinda Munger said the members of the 2007 task force were part of the leadership 5 survey on the plan through individual conversations. She said that, because the plan is due in 6 this form to the state library by June 28th, 2013, feedback is needed from the Board of County 7 Commissioners tonight. She said staff will continue to reach out to the community, though it 8 may not be a formal work group. She said that this plan needs to be reviewed annually in order 9 to be viable. She said she hopes to involve citizens on a broader scale, while seeking out some 10 of the leaders of that task force. 11 Chair Jacobs asked that this information be included when the final recommendation is 12 brought back. 13 Commissioner McKee said that when this comes back in the fall, staff needs to address 14 the parking issue, including the availability of free parking. 15 Lucinda Munger said this was brought up at a prior work session, and the Board of 16 Alderman is aware that this is an issue for the library and downtown in general. She said that 17 there is a town owned property that may be converted into a parking area. 18 Commissioner Gordon said she would like to see a more formal detailed statement of 19 how the needs assessment relates to the goals and objectives, as well as the metrics. 20 Dr. Anthony Chow described what a 21St century library will look like. He said that core 21 services that have been identified show little change, but the means by which these are met are 22 changing. He said there is more choice, and technology is value-added, but not a replacement. 23 He noted that patrons still express a desire for both books and e-books. He said the trend 24 shows that urban libraries are becoming a mixed use space and a social place. He said there 25 is more versatility and diversity of services. 26 27 2. Assessment of Jail Alternative Programs 28 29 Michael Talbert reviewed the following background information from the abstract: 30 In October 2012, the NC Council of State authorized issuance of a 50 year land lease to 31 Orange County for approximately 6.8 acres for construction of a Jail facility. The proposed new 32 Jail is included in the County's FY 2013-18 CIP, with an estimated total project cost of 33 $30,250,000. A consultant has been retained to evaluate the site and determine the best 34 configuration of the potential site, along with any constraints (environmental/regulatory for 35 example) that might impact the development. Site related planning costs have been included in 36 the CIP at $250,000 for FY 2013-14. Construction cost estimates from firms in the business of 37 building detention facilities range from $80,000 to $120,000 per bed. The new jail is intended to 38 house a minimum of 250 prisoners and provide support spaces needed for such a facility. Site 39 design costs are planned for FY 2015-16, and Architectural/Engineering costs are included in 40 FY 2016-17, with construction costs in FY 2017-18. 41 The proposed new Jail project involves the review of jail alternative programs, individual 42 program effectiveness and impact on the inmate population of the Orange County Jail. At the 43 Board's August 30, 2012 work session, District Court Judge Joseph M. Buckner presented an 44 overview of Court Programs to the Board. Attachment A is the PowerPoint presented by Judge 45 Buckner that outlines Court Programs. 46 The County requested and has received a proposal from Solutions for Local 47 Government, Inc., to assess Jail Alternative Programs in Orange County. Before planning for a 48 new jail begins, a comprehensive assessment of jail alternative programs needs to be 49 completed. Solutions for Local Government, Inc. has experience evaluating alternatives to 50 incarceration related programs and assessing the impact on jail population. Attachment B