Orange County NC Website
14 <br /> 1 Chair Jacobs suggested a letter be sent to each mayor to let them know this is an effort <br /> 2 the Board is attempting to bring to fruition. The idea would be to try and bring it to the AOG <br /> 3 meeting to get their responses. <br /> 4 Chair Jacobs said it is a good idea to engage the Agricultural preservation board and to <br /> 5 run by them the matrix of the most intensive uses <br /> 6 Commissioner Prices suggested another look at the tiers. <br /> 7 Chair Jacobs suggested staff work on this and then send notification to Hillsborough. <br /> 8 Commissioner Gordon asked for clarification on the tiers. <br /> 9 Perdita Holtz said this is embedded in the matrix and tier 3 is the most intensive. <br /> 10 Chair Jacobs said the Board will get back the ASE draft manual in the longer term, and <br /> 11 in the shorter term will define the proposals for the rural buffer to be presented to AOG. <br /> 12 Chair Jacobs said this could come back in September. He asked for a more detailed <br /> 13 explanation of the conditional zoning, including examples. <br /> 14 Commissioner McKee said that the Board needs to think about the fact that any of these <br /> 15 enterprises that are successful will be fairly intrusive and expansive, by nature. He said he <br /> 16 does not disagree but he feels that the Board needs to be prepared for how to deal with <br /> 17 opposition to this. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 4. Follow Up Discussion from January 29, 2013 Work Session on Board <br /> 20 Protocols/Advisory Board Procedures <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Decision Points for BOCC: <br /> 23 <br /> 24 1. Follow up to Petition by BOCC Member: Review and consider a request that the <br /> 25 Board moves forward with establishing a new and thorough application/process for <br /> 26 prospective appointees for boards with fiduciary or specific statutory responsibilities <br /> 27 (OWASA, Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, E&R Board, ABC Board). <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Background: The response to this petition from the Chair/Vice Chair at agenda review was: <br /> 30 Response: A) The Board will move forward with establishing a new, specific, and thorough <br /> 31 application process for prospective appointees to four boards: O WASH, Planning Board, Board <br /> 32 of Adjustment, E&R Board. Chair Jacobs suggested including ABC Board, as we had previously <br /> 33 discussed vetting applicants for boards with fiduciary responsibilities. Consult County Attorney <br /> 34 on proposed verbiage for applications for the aforementioned advisory boards; B) Consider <br /> 35 whether to return to matter of interviewing, reviewing, and promoting specific board applicants <br /> 36 at a future work session, to be scheduled. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 The Attorney had asked for feedback from Board members as to questions and concerns they <br /> 39 would like addressed in a revised application but as of yet, he has not received any feedback. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Discussion: <br /> 42 Donna Baker said the Attorney did not get feedback on what the Board would want to <br /> 43 see in a revised application. <br /> 44 Chair Jacobs said that if anyone would like to volunteer to help with the process and the <br /> 45 form, to please step forward. <br /> 46 Commissioner McKee and Donna Baker noted that the Board of Adjustments has been <br /> 47 deferred, and the Planning Board also has openings. He suggested that these appointments <br /> 48 be made with the idea that changes are to be made to the application process. <br /> 49 Commissioner Rich asked if the idea was to change the form or to include an interview <br /> 50 of the candidates. <br />