Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-17-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-17-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-17-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 3:35:36 PM
Creation date
9/13/2013 11:56:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/17/2013
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-17-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> 1 zoning will only apply for enterprises that are not on a bona fide farm. She said the goal is to <br /> 2 assist farmers with their land but also to promote small businesses that support these farmers. <br /> 3 She would like comments to come back to the Board on what can be done to address some of <br /> 4 the issues on the grid. <br /> 5 Commissioner Pelissier referred to the questions about revising home occupations. She <br /> 6 said there also needs to be a discussion about the arts and culture communities. She said she <br /> 7 has heard from a number of people regarding the restrictions, and many counties are less <br /> 8 restrictive in their zoning regulations. She said there should be a focus on promoting <br /> 9 appropriate scalable businesses in the entire rural area. <br /> 10 Commissioner Rich said it would be helpful to see an example of a zoning project. It is <br /> 11 more complicated than confusing. She is not convinced that the County needs to have certain <br /> 12 businesses in the rural buffer. She would like to know what their partners think about the rural <br /> 13 buffer, since there has been no conversation since the 2007 discussion. <br /> 14 Commissioner Rich said she agrees with Commissioner Pelissier that there needs to be <br /> 15 some consideration of the arts and cultural communities. <br /> 16 Commissioner Gordon said she is not talking about bona fide farms. She said it would <br /> 17 make sense that if farmers are given a chance to do things that people generally have a <br /> 18 consensus about, things will probably move further. She feels that trying for more intensive <br /> 19 uses will only make things more complicated. She said she would start with lower impact uses; <br /> 20 and if there is a desire to do something in the rural buffer then it is important to talk with their <br /> 21 partners. She feels that the conversation should stick with Agricultural Support Enterprises <br /> 22 only, rather than opening up everything related to the rural buffer. <br /> 23 Commissioner Price said she feels strongly about#1, to ask staff to work on a <br /> 24 comprehensive project and get it done. She said the focus should be to make things as easy <br /> 25 as possible for people trying to farm. She said there needs to be some conversation with <br /> 26 partners on the rural buffer. She said that thresholds, scales and intensities should be looked <br /> 27 at. She said she remembers that there was a desire not to have meat slaughtering plants. She <br /> 28 said the zoning method choices are too overwhelming. <br /> 29 Commissioner Price said this discussion should stick with just farming for now, rather <br /> 30 than enlarge the issue to include arts. She said that that issue won't sit within the ASE. <br /> 31 Chair Jacobs said he agreed that more work should be done on #1 to make it more of <br /> 32 an enabling process. He said it would be best to take out the most intensive uses. He said <br /> 33 that the origin of this conversation was Maple View Farms, which technically was not allowed to <br /> 34 be where it was built. He gave the history of the store and the process of building and permits <br /> 35 in that case. He said it was a struggle to get it off the ground, and now it is a landmark <br /> 36 operation. <br /> 37 Chair Jacobs said that, for#2, he feels there should be a look at rural buffer; but a <br /> 38 conversation should be had with the partners at AOG before moving forward. <br /> 39 Chair Jacobs said he is not ready to address #4 until more information is gained. <br /> 40 Chair Jacobs said, regarding which categories should not be encouraged, his only <br /> 41 thought is the water quality critical areas. He said he has no problem with including the arts. <br /> 42 He said, regarding other issues, there have been discussions about differentiating impacts in <br /> 43 and to rural areas and urban areas. He gave the example of a proposed Montessori school. <br /> 44 Chair Jacobs said it would be a good idea to find a place to engage the Agricultural <br /> 45 Preservation Board in this discussion. <br /> 46 Commissioner Price said her only concern is that the home occupation is under a <br /> 47 different category and she said she doesn't want it to go away. <br /> 48 Commissioner Gordon said it is important to let their partners know that that the rural <br /> 49 buffer is being worked on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.