Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: September 5, 2013 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item No. 6-a <br /> SUBJECT: Baldwin Zoning Atlas Amendment — Public Hearing Closure and Action (No <br /> Additional Comments Accepted) <br /> DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) Yes <br /> ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> 1. Vicinity Map Michael D. Harvey, Planner III, (919) 245-2597 <br /> 2. May 28, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing Craig Benedict, Director, (919) 245-2592 <br /> Legal.Advertisement <br /> 3. Ordinance Approving Rezoning Petition <br /> 4. Ordinance Denying Rezoning Petition <br /> 5. Resolution Concerning Statement of <br /> Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br /> 6. Resolution Concerning Statement of <br /> Inconsistency with Comprehensive Plan <br /> 7. Excerpt of Approved May 28, 2013 <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing Minutes <br /> 8. Excerpt of Approved June 5, 2013 <br /> Planning Board Minutes <br /> PURPOSE: To receive the Planning Board recommendation, close the public hearing, and <br /> make a decision on an owner-initiated Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone a 3.36 acre parcel of <br /> property from EDE-1 (Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity) to EDE-2 (Economic <br /> Development Eno Higher - Intensity) in accordance with the provisions -of-. the Unified <br /> Development Ordinance (UDO). <br /> As a reminder, the reconvening of this hearing is solely to receive the Planning Board <br /> recommendation and any additional written evidence submitted since the May 28, 2013 <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing. This hearing is not intended to solicit additional input from the public <br /> or the applicant. While the BOCC may ask staff questions related to the review of a given item, <br /> comments from the public shall not be solicited. <br /> BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the May 28, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing. Staff <br /> indicated the applicant sought the rezoning believing the EDE-2 zoning designation was more <br /> appropriate for the property given its frontage along US Highway 70 and represented a logical <br /> extension of the existing district. Please refer to Attachment 1 for a vicinity map showing the <br /> subject parcel. <br /> During the hearing the following questions were asked: <br />