Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment 8 <br />1 Excerpt of approved June 5, 2013 <br />2 Planning Board minutes <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />Minutes <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />JUNE 5, 2013 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />19 <br />Approved 7/10/13 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck (Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill Township <br />Representative; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; <br />Herman Staats, At- Large, Cedar Grove Township; Johnny Randall, At -Large Chapel Hill Township; Alan Campbell, <br />Cedar Grove Township Representative <br />MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrea Rohrbacher, At -Large Chapel Hill Township; Dawn Brezina, Eno Township Representative; <br />Maxecine Mitchell, At -Large Bingham Township; Rachel Hawkins, Hillsborough Township Representative; <br />STAFF PRESENT: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II <br />Agenda Item 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT — To make a recommendation to the BOCC on a property owner - <br />initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas to rezone a 3.36 acre parcel of property along US <br />Highway 70 (PIN 9803 -81 -7503) from EDE -1 (Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity) to <br />EDE -2 (Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity). This item was heard at the May 28, 2013 <br />quarterly public hearing. <br />Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor <br />Michael Harvey: Reviewed abstract. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: The EDE -1 to the south of that property, the expectation is it would stay EDE -1. <br />Michael Harvey: Action on this item will not have any impact on the zoning of the southern property. Even if the zoning <br />of the Baldwin property is changed to EDE -2, the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance requires a 100 foot <br />perimeter buffer for all EDD zoned properties. Regardless of the zoning of the Baldwin property the 100 foot buffer will <br />still apply. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: The 100 foot buffer is only in the transition from EDD to something else, it is not EDE adjacent to <br />each other? <br />Michael Harvey: I am referring to the 100 foot perimeter buffer that has to surround the EDD zoned areas of the <br />County. The rezoning of this property will not impact or reduce this perimeter buffer requirement in any way. Let's <br />assume this parcel to the south of the Baldwin property were rezoned to Rural Residential. This would mean the <br />perimeter buffer would be imposed on the properties to the north. The rezoning of the Baldwin property from EDE -1 to <br />EDE -2 however will not impact this requirement. Also bear in mind there are different land use buffers required for <br />different land uses. EDD properties adjacent to one another have to have some form of land use buffer based on what <br />is proposed to be developed. <br />MOTION made by Lisa Stuckey to accept staffs recommendation and recommend approval to the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />