Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-16-1997 - 10e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 12-16-1997
>
Agenda - 12-16-1997 - 10e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2013 11:59:12 AM
Creation date
9/3/2013 11:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/16/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19971216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report on the Teen Court Prom_. ,„,c <br /> 0 <br /> U <br /> possible approach to help stem the tide of juvenile delinquency in Durham County. In the <br /> summer of 1994, with the strong support and endorsement of District Attorney Jim Hardin, <br /> Jr., she approached the Durham Public Schools' Safe Schools Office about cooperatively <br /> developing a grant proposal to establish a teen court program. The Safe Schools Office <br /> heartily endorsed the idea, and together they prepared the grant application. The AOC <br /> approved the application, and a grant of$20,000 was awarded to the Durham Public Schools <br /> in the fall of 1994, pursuant to the 1994 legislation. Soon thereafter, a Teen Court Advisory <br /> Board was established, comprising school officials,juvenile services officials, a member of the <br /> Durham Police Department, a member of the Sheriffs Department, attorneys, a city <br /> councilman, a representative from the Durham Dispute Settlement Center, and the Durham <br /> Community Service Coordinator. <br /> The Board chose Attorney Timothy W. Morse to serve as the Teen Court Coordinator. <br /> Mr. Morse began in October 1994, serving under contract with Durham Public Schools. He <br /> immediately began to formulate policies and procedures, develop training manuals, discuss the <br /> program with school principals, enlist support from attorneys to train students, and recruit and <br /> train volunteer student attorneys. The first Teen Court session was held in December 1994. <br /> Y. <br /> OPERATION OF THE TEEN COURT PROGRAMS <br /> .w <br /> Overview of the Process <br /> Cumberland County. The Teen Court program in Cumberland County accepts referrals <br /> from juvenile intake, juvenile court, the police, the sheriff, the schools, and district court. <br /> Juveniles referred to Teen Court are generally first-time offenders who are at least 10 years old <br /> and who allegedly misbehave at school or commit a nonviolent offense that would be a <br /> misdemeanor or an infraction if committed by an adult. If the juvenile admits guilt, the <br /> referral source may refer the case to Teen Court, thus offering the offender its constructive <br /> sentencing opportunity. If the juvenile chooses this opportunity, and Teen Court staff <br /> determine that the offense is appropriate for Teen Court, the offender and parent/guardian <br /> meet with Teen Court staff for an interview, during which they receive more information, sign ; <br /> a contract and complete paperwork (including an indication of interest in specific types of <br /> community service), and receive a court date. Participation is voluntary, and the juvenile may <br /> decide to withdraw at any stage, in which case the referral source is so notified. , <br /> The offender and parent/guardian appear for court as scheduled, and discuss the case <br /> with the defense attorney. When the case is called, the juvenile is sworn in, tells what <br /> happened, and answers questions asked by the defense attorney and prosecutor. The attorneys <br /> present closing arguments and sentence recommendations to the jury, which generally <br /> comprises four to eight members. Since the offender admits guilt, the jury's duty during <br /> deliberations is to arrive at a unanimous verdict on a "Constructive Sentence," which must fall <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.