Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C3 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

July 10, 2013 — Ordinance Review Committee (ORC). 0 A Planning Board member expressed concern over the proposed amendment indicating he believed this was an unnecessary political reaction arising out of objections to the development of a volunteer fire department substation off of Neville Road. Further, it was suggested this amendment would have a negative impact on local volunteer fire departments who do not have the necessary budget or meeting facilities to comply with the proposal. There were no suggested amendments made by members. Chair Hallenbeck suggested individual members put their concerns in writing for staff and the BOCC to address at the appropriate time. To date no written comments have been received. Please refer to Attachment 3 for additional information. October 2, 2013 — Recommendation b. Advisory Boards: c. Local Government Review: d. Notice Requirements Legal advertisement will be published in accordance with the provisions of the UDO. e. Outreach: ❑ General Public: ❑ Small Area Plan Workgroup: ® Other: Letter /e -mail sent to various County agencies (i.e. DEAPR, Asset Management, Solid Waste, etc.) and other local entities (i.e. local volunteer fire departments and rescue squads) potentially impacted by the proposal outlining the amendment and soliciting comments for inclusion within the QPH package. An e -mail was sent to various County Departments on June 24, 2013 requested review of the proposed amendment(s). Responses from DEAPR and Solid Waste expressed concern over a potential duplication of efforts as there is typically significant public outreach on various projects (i.e. parks, solid waste convenience centers, etc.) Staff added language to the proposed amendment address this concern by eliminating the neighborhood information 11