Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
8/30/2013 3:30:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/9/2013
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C3
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-09-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 <br />DRAFT <br />107 <br />108 Pete Hallenbeck: I understand you think this is political but if you do that and it goes to a public hearing, you have shown that <br />109 you have taken the time to listen to the public. Ultimately the decision is made by the BOCC but it is a good way to be <br />110 proactive. <br />111 <br />112 Perdita Holtz: Just for clarification, the decision is not made by the BOCC because it is a staff approval. <br />113 <br />114 Stephanie O'Rourke: Can you give me another scenario of what you would have to deal with? <br />115 <br />116 Michael Harvey: Orange County Department of Environment Parks Natural Agricultural does park planning. If they wish to <br />117 propose a park, they would be subject to these rules and regulations. <br />118 <br />119 Paul Guthrie: The County wants to designate a bicycle trail or a hiking trail covering a great deal of distance and many <br />120 owners. Under this language, would they have to reach out to every owner within 500 feet of that trail in order to satisfy this <br />121 ordinance? <br />122 <br />123 Michael Harvey: With respect to government uses, the land use category this would impact, you have government facilities <br />124 and office buildings so yes I could see a trail falling into that category but also I would say that development of such a trail <br />125 would be discussed in a public forum where the county would advertise .... <br />126 <br />127 Paul Guthrie: But not necessarily see a certified letter? <br />128 <br />129 Michael Harvey: Not necessarily but we have written in this code that if there is planning effort soliciting public comment or <br />130 involvement with the development of a plan, that satisfies this meeting requirement. If you any other questions or concerns, <br />131 please email me. <br />132 <br />133 <br />134 <br />135 AGENDA ITEM 3: ADJOURNMENT <br />136 <br />137 Meeting was adjourned by consensus <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.