Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 09-09-2013 - C3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
8/30/2013 3:30:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/9/2013
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C3
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-09-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br />DRAFT <br />54 <br />55 Michael Harvey: This is to initiate and have a dialogue with adjoining property owners to address or mitigate those concerns if <br />56 feasible. <br />57 <br />58 Tony Blake: I am trying to understand the purpose of this if it is not binding in any way. I am thinking of the people that are <br />59 currently against this. I don't see any way we will change any minds. <br />60 <br />61 Michael Harvey: There is a broader issue here that doesn't necessarily involve the White Cross Volunteer Fire Department. <br />62 There is a feeling among the Board that any time there is government project, there needs to be notification to the public. <br />63 <br />64 Pete Hallenbeck: Imagine you had a meeting for everyone at the volunteer fire department and have slips with questions, i.e. <br />65 are they adjacent property owners, give them check boxes and a place for comments. You could have a presentation and let <br />66 people speak and in writing. Then you could say this is what we did at the meeting with committee which you could document <br />67 with an executive summary. <br />68 <br />69 Tony Blake: Where does this document go? <br />70 <br />71 Michael Harvey: To the county planning staff as part of your site plan submittal. <br />72 <br />73 Craig Benedict: During the subdivision process, we take those comments into consideration and the neighborhood <br />74 information notes become part of our packages. <br />75 <br />76 Stephanie O'Rourke: How do you handle it if they all object? <br />77 <br />78 Craig Benedict: Michael, you go through the uses permitted by right by uses .... <br />79 <br />80 Michael Harvey: That is the first item on the regular agenda I don't want to jump into that presentation. Government uses are <br />81 permitted by right meaning that they are subject to staff review and approval with a site plan submitted according to this code. <br />82 There are typically no public hearings required, the BOCC will not be approving it or the planning board. In this specific <br />83 instance, the White Cross Volunteer Department Substation will still be approved and acted upon by the county planning staff. <br />84 <br />85 Paul Guthrie: This language which has been developed because of the White Cross application and I would assume the <br />86 property owners within 500 feet of the property on Neville Road is a handful of them easily for and that is simple. If this goes <br />87 into the general development, what will you do when you have this issue come up and three condo units with 200 separate <br />88 owners and you have to go through this process? I am concerned that this has implications down the road. Have we thought <br />89 through in the development of this language the implications that other situations and concerns? <br />90 <br />91 Michael Harvey: This language is consistent with existing language on how we handle neighborhood information meetings for <br />92 several projects. If you have a government use that is adjacent property where there are 200 lots, then you will have to notify <br />93 all 200 of them. If it was a major subdivision, the staff would still have to notify those property owners. You will typically find <br />94 that both state and federal governments are exempt from zoning regulations. <br />95 <br />96 Tony Blake: I think this is reactive in a political year by the County Commissioners and it has bad implications down the road. <br />97 This is time consuming and resource consuming and what the tax payers give us is to be used for fighting fire. If the county <br />98 wants it that it is the county's role to hold it and I would also suggest strongly that this also be able to be satisfied in the form of <br />99 writing rather than a public meeting because we have a very small fire station. I think it puts an unnecessary burden on a <br />100 volunteer organization. <br />101 <br />102 Pete Hallenbeck: I suggest you take those suggestions and put them in writing so when the BOCC look at passing this UDO <br />103 amendment, you could speak as a citizen. There is the opportunity here; no matter what you do there will be people against it. <br />104 But it would be a good opportunity to give information. <br />105 <br />106 Tony Blake: The end result is that it would be neighbor versus neighbor. <br />PJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.