Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 2:52:50 PM
Creation date
8/30/2013 10:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-05-2013
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 <br /> 1 Chair Jacobs summarized the plan. <br /> 2 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner McKee to defer <br /> 3 consideration of this item until fall, when staff is asked to come back with a digested form highlighting <br /> 4 changes to the ordinance, addressing points made by the public and why the work group agrees or <br /> 5 disagrees with these points. <br /> 6 Commissioner porosin asked if this motion includes bringing back the recovery fees issue before <br /> 7 the fall. <br /> 8 Commissioner Gordon clarified that she would prefer to bring it all back in the fall, since the June <br /> 9 18th meeting may be too full. She said she would defer the decision about the animal recovery issue/fees <br /> 10 to the agenda review team. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 13 <br /> 14 c. Refund Requests for Inaccurate Square Footaqe Calculation <br /> 15 The Board was to consider five taxpayers' refund requests for the years 2008 through 2012. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 A motion was made by Commissioner porosin, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to defer this <br /> 18 item to the June 18th BOCC meeting. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 21 <br /> 22 d. Work Group and Charqe for an Assessment of Jail Alternative Proqrams <br /> 23 The Board was to consider the creation of a Work Group and Charge for the Assessment of Jail Alternative <br /> 24 Programs. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 DEFERRED <br /> 27 <br /> 28 8. Reports NONE <br /> 29 <br /> 30 9. County Manaqer's Report <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Chair Jacobs had asked Frank Clifton to reaffirm with towns on a solid waste inter-local agreement. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Frank Clifton said right now the towns are waiting for an analysis of their current services studies. <br /> 35 He said that both are taking waste to a private transfer station in Durham County. He said the Town of <br /> 36 Chapel Hill is still analyzing pursuit of its own transfer station and the possible inclusion of Carrboro in this. <br /> 37 He said Hillsborough is still just as close to Durham. He said the towns are still interested in a construction <br /> 38 and debris landfill, and there is continued discussion of Chapel Hill having its own recycling program. He <br /> 39 said that all of this means there is no ongoing effort for a solid waste agreement until the towns have sorted <br /> 40 through these considerations. <br /> 41 Commissioner Rich asked if this means the County is not considering an inter-local agreement. <br /> 42 Frank Clifton said there have been some preliminary staff discussions. He said the primary issue <br /> 43 is what an agreement would entail and recycling is the main topic. He said much of this depends on what <br /> 44 direction the County decides to take. <br /> 45 Commissioner Rich encouraged everyone to keep those conversations going and keep a positive <br /> 46 tone to encourage a partnership. <br /> 47 Frank Clifton said one thing that has been discussed is the legal authority to operate within the <br /> 48 Chapel Hill section of Durham County. He said this requires Chapel Hill to include a provision in its budget <br /> 49 ordinance to allow the County to levy a fee and collect for the services within the town's authority. He noted <br /> 50 that while the County can come up with a comprehensive countywide cost, each individual town has a <br /> 51 different cost to consider. <br /> 52 <br /> 53 10. County Attorney's Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.