Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 2:52:50 PM
Creation date
8/30/2013 10:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-05-2013
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> 1 She agreed that there should be a defined group who can be given a charge. She said that this will <br /> 2 not prevent others from giving feedback into the group discussion. <br /> 3 Commissioner McKee said the moment the sign-up sheet for input was laid out, a formal group was <br /> 4 established. He said it is worrisome to see the proposed expansion costs. His main concern is that a very <br /> 5 expensive structure will be built that won't provide any services, which is not the point. He said the services <br /> 6 that will be available are important, as is the historical significance of the facility. He said one way to kill a <br /> 7 project is to make it too expensive <br /> 8 Commissioner Rich said it would be nice to see budget figures on some proposed services such as <br /> 9 a library, Cybrary and others. <br /> 10 Jeff Thompson said as part of the preliminary plan process, this can be vetted out and brought back <br /> 11 in the fall. <br /> 12 Chair Jacobs said this is a circular argument. He said that investigating more possibilities creates <br /> 13 more expenditure. He said the cost of looking at the three proposed alternative uses is $40,000' versus the <br /> 14 $168,000 for the other consulting. He feels this is a comparatively small additional cost. <br /> 15 Chair Jacobs said the community simply wanted a library/Cybrary, and a community resource; and it <br /> 16 was someone else who brought up all these other services. He said this is not about duplicating other <br /> 17 service models. He said the main reason, other than safety issues, that staff recommended closing the old <br /> 18 library was because it cost $125,000 to heat/cool that one room. He said the people criticizing the board for <br /> 19 spending money should know that the library was closed to save money. He summarized that the Board <br /> 20 wants a formal structure, scope of services, charge, time, and specific membership, with background <br /> 21 information presented at the next meeting. <br /> 22 Commissioner Gordon said there should be a formal group established and nothing should be done <br /> 23 between now and 1 gtn. <br /> 24 Commissioner porosin asked what is going to come back on the 18th if there are no meetings <br /> 25 between now and then. <br /> 26 Commissioner Gordon said the formal charge, timeline, structure and the membership list will be <br /> 27 established. She said none of this exists now, so this information should come back on June 1gtn <br /> 28 Commissioner Price asked when the community will have input. <br /> 29 Commissioner porosin said there have already been community meetings. <br /> 30 Commissioner Price said more are needed and this needs to move forward with community input. <br /> 31 Chair Jacobs said there is still an issue with understanding what the community said and staff will <br /> 32 bring back these notes on June 1 gtn <br /> 33 Frank Clifton said there were several community meetings with Commissioners participating in <br /> 34 them. He said a variety of issues were discussed, including services. He mentioned the overriding issue of <br /> 35 the septic system and reviewed engineering issues that limit expansion. He said many of the decisions are <br /> 36 not staff driven and these issues and the discussion points can be presented at the next meeting. <br /> 37 Chair Jacobs said the Board wants background information, including a review of past public <br /> 38 comments; formal structure; timeline; cost; membership; and scope of services within the current septic <br /> 39 limitations. <br /> 40 This was agreed to by Board Consensus. <br /> 41 Chair Jacobs said the discussion group is open to general public and interested parties should sign <br /> 42 up. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 <br /> 45 <br /> 46 b. Unified Animal Control Ordinance <br /> 47 The Board considered amending the Orange County Animal Control Ordinance to make it a Unified <br /> 48 Animal Control Ordinance. <br /> 49 Bob Marotto introduced himself and Annette Moore, staff attorney. He said this is an amendment to <br /> 50 set the basis for a more unified animal control ordinance' and the backbone is the existing county <br /> 51 ordinance. He said this effort has involved staff from Carrboro and Chapel Hill Animal Control, as well as <br /> 52 the town manager, the police chief of Hillsborough and the Animal Services Advisory Board (ASAB). He <br /> 53 said staff inet with the ASAB three times this year in developing the ordinance being presented tonight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.