Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 2:52:50 PM
Creation date
8/30/2013 10:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-05-2013
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 1 In regard to the proposed site of the White Cross fire station on Neville Rd., I simply want to state <br /> 2 the following. <br /> 3 There has been no attempt to contact homeowners directly in the immediate area about this matter. <br /> 4 That, in itself, demands this procedure be slowed down so all area residents can be notified and heard. <br /> 5 The exact location on Neville Road is on a bend in the road, creating blind spots for traffic coming <br /> 6 from either direction. This curve has had several accidents a year, even without having a truck pulling out <br /> 7 just around another curve. <br /> 8 All of the homes in the area are on well water. As all fire stations need to wash vehicles, hoses and <br /> 9 equipment regularly and the additional drain would lower well water levels. The tank trucks also need to fill <br /> 10 up with well water, as there are no hydrants or draw ponds in the neighborhood. There needs to be a water <br /> 11 table data study and review made public about the potential draw from a shared well water source. <br /> 12 The waste and run-off water from that usage would run downhill about 500 feet into Phil's Creek <br /> 13 feeding into the University Lake Watershed reservoir. Additionally a bridge crossing this creek is failing and <br /> 14 is overdue for replacement. It has been in the process of getting band aid repairs for its decaying wood <br /> 15 pilings—which have already been weakened by the additional load of the county trucks that single out <br /> 16 Neville Road to access the Ferguson Road dump station. <br /> 17 That same small bridge is currently too narrow to let 2 pickup trucks pass in opposite directions at <br /> 18 the same time; so what will happen with larger fire trucks? <br /> 19 There are plenty of spots along Hwy 54 close to Neville Road with large lots big enough for a fire <br /> 20 station and room for trucks to turn around in. Hwy 54 is a full size road zoned for multiple uses. <br /> 21 We would have none of the following that would be welcome to them: <br /> 22 • No public water supply <br /> 23 • No public sewer supply <br /> 24 • No Time Warner Cable <br /> 25 • No fiber-optic high speed data <br /> 26 • No public natural gas <br /> 27 • Plus they have had their access to their trash disposal cut in half <br /> 28 So why is the county putting a fire station, literally in our back yard, that would frequently be <br /> 29 disruptive to our lives, without ever giving them any modern utilities for decades? Put this on Hwy 54, just <br /> 30 up the block! <br /> 31 Finally, as most of the area homeowners have been and still are predominantly African-American; <br /> 32 this abuse of power, stealth and ability seems all too familiar to the Rogers Road water situation in Orange <br /> 33 County. <br /> 34 Thank you for your time. Please give us ours. <br /> 35 Bill Holmberg - 1000 Sabre Court, Chapel Hill 27516 - 919-418-0140. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Dave Laudicina read the following statement: <br /> 38 My name is Dave Laudicina, and I am speaking for both my wife Becky and myself tonight. <br /> 39 I am speaking tonight to urge you to adhere to the manager's budget recommendation and not raise <br /> 40 the Orange County property tax rate. There are many reasons both internal to Orange county and external <br /> 41 to justify not putting on any more tax burden on Orange County residents <br /> 42 From an internal view we have been living with unfair and inequitable property values since 2009. <br /> 43 Recently, you all voted to postpone the next revaluation till 2017. This was rushed through without giving <br /> 44 Orange County citizens adequate opportunity to detail their specific concerns in a public hearing <br /> 45 environment, even though in 2009 thousands of residents turned out in various protests to tell you the 2009 <br /> 46 valuations were wrong. We can see the proof of this in valuations data. Two comparable properties in our <br /> 47 area recently sold for 15% lower than the 2009 valuation. A property in our neighborhood sold for 15% <br /> 48 lower than the 2009 valuation in 2011, and a property directly behind our property sold for 19% lower than <br /> 49 the 2009 valuation in 2012. Until the property valuations are balanced to fair and equitable valuations, we <br /> 50 believe it is prudent to not put anymore unfair property tax burden on Orange County residents. <br /> 51 From an external viewpoint, NC residents, especially in our demographic (seniors on a fixed <br /> 52 income), are under a statewide assault from all aspects in terms of taxes. Proposals to change the tax <br /> 53 calculations in NC put a huge new burden on low and middle income earners residing in NC. The <br /> 54 proposals place social security income in the classes of income that the NC income tax will apply. Even <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.