Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 3. Overview and Analysis of Education Fundinq Provided to the Chapel Hill <br /> 4 Carrboro City Schools and Oranqe County School Districts in Relationship to the 48.1% <br /> 5 Fundinq Tarqet <br /> 6 Clarence Grier reviewed the history of the 48.1% Funding Target, as listed in the <br /> 7 abstract. He said that in 1999-2000 the Board of Commissioners and both school districts got <br /> 8 together to decide on consistent funding options. He reviewed the funding information as listed <br /> 9 in attachment a. <br /> 10 He said that in half of the years since the funding target was implemented, the schools <br /> 11 have been funded above the funding target and the other half fell below the target. He said the <br /> 12 property tax rate increases in 2000 and 2008 have also been used to fund the school districts at <br /> 13 48.1%. He noted that the General Fund Budget has gradually decreased since 2008. He <br /> 14 reviewed the inclusions in operational funding and the numbers on attachment B. <br /> 15 Clarence Grier reviewed attachment C and noted that even though there may be <br /> 16 enough debt capacity to add a school, the debt service has an effect on the operational funding. <br /> 17 Clarence Grier said when looking at educational funding by source, it can be noted that <br /> 18 ,back in 2000, the state was the largest funder of education. Moving forward to look at 2013, <br /> 19 the county portion equates to about $15-16m for school funding. He said that as state funding <br /> 20 has decreased the county's portion has increased. <br /> 21 CHCCS Board Member Mike Kelly asked Clarence Grier to add the school boards <br /> 22 budget to the numbers. <br /> 23 Clarence Grier noted that enrollment has increased by 23% since 2000. <br /> 24 OCS Board Member Debbie Piscitelli asked if new facilities coming online could <br /> 25 negatively affect the 48.1% figure for the opposite school system. <br /> 26 Clarence Grier said yes, it could and said this goes both ways. <br /> 27 Frank Clifton said he sees a reliance on the 48.1% funding by both school systems <br /> 28 growing and he said that school debt impacts operation. He said that the debt comes on one <br /> 29 year and then the payments start the next year. He said that the operational dollars are lower <br /> 30 once the debt comes into play. This has been lessened by lower interest rates, but this will <br /> 31 change as rates rise. He said this needs to be looked at. <br /> 32 Chair Jacobs asked Clarence Grier if the annual per pupil allocations can be added to <br /> 33 the sheet, and Clarence Grier said yes. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 CHCCS Board Member Jamezetta Bedford asked if it is it still true that residential <br /> 36 growth does not pay for itself, and Frank Clifton answered yes. She asked if there has been <br /> 37 any progress with economic development, and Chair Jacobs answered yes. <br /> 38 CHCCS Board Member Mike Kelly referenced Debbie Piscatelli's comment regarding <br /> 39 the impact of new schools and asked how this can be managed. <br /> 40 CHCCS Board Member Mia Burroughs said there is growth in CHCCS and building out <br /> 41 is not so far away. She said there is more room for growth in Orange County and this is a <br /> 42 challenge that can go either way. <br /> 43 CHCCS Board Member Jamezetta Bedford referenced the great amount of older <br /> 44 schools in both systems and said these needs will be significant and there is not sufficient <br /> 45 money to cover them. She said there have been studies about this and it is just now being <br /> 46 touched on. She said this needs to be in the back of peoples' minds as it will need to be <br /> 47 addressed. <br /> 48 Chair Jacobs said there are many forms of equity, and one system should not receive all <br /> 49 of the funding while the other district sits and watches. He said that $1 million went to Orange <br />