Orange County NC Website
17 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Pre-K <br /> 3 CHCCS Chair Brownstein said this conversation has gone on for the past two years to <br /> 4 address having Pre-k in their elementary schools and its impact on capacity. She said the idea <br /> 5 behind the draft resolution is to have something in writing about the district philosophy on the <br /> 6 value of pre-k; and to create a consensus on decisions regarding capacity and when new <br /> 7 schools need to come on board. <br /> 8 Chair Jacobs noted several sheets at the Commissioner's places from the different <br /> 9 schools, relating to pre-k numbers. <br /> 10 OCS Chair Coffey said only one elementary school in the district has been built since <br /> 11 the 1996 school construction standards, so this is the only school that allows for pre-k. The rest <br /> 12 of the pre-k classes are absorbed by the current elementary capacity. <br /> 13 Chair Jacobs said the issue is how to count these classrooms toward school capacity. <br /> 14 He said some may feel that, by counting pre-k toward capacity, the county will rush too quickly <br /> 15 to having to build another elementary school. He said there was no consensus among the <br /> 16 three Chairs on how to finish the wording on the resolution because each of them came at it <br /> 17 from a different position. <br /> 18 CHCCS Chair Brownstein said the resolution is pretty factual, and then the meat of it is <br /> 19 the last paragraph, which discusses how the issue will be addressed. <br /> 20 Chair Jacobs said if no one has anything to add, this can be hashed out at school <br /> 21 collaboration. <br /> 22 CHCCS Board Member Jamezetta Bedford said that both school systems support <br /> 23 reflecting reality and that schools are very much overcrowded when you count these pre-k <br /> 24 classrooms. <br /> 25 CHCCS Chair Brownstein said there is not a version of SAPFO with and without these <br /> 26 classrooms. She said this would give a better view of the implications. She said this may be <br /> 27 needed in the school collaboration meetings. <br /> 28 Chair Jacobs said the Board is very supportive of Pre-K, but there is also not a mandate <br /> 29 for the county to provide that space. He said if Pre-K is moved into the SAPFO numbers, then <br /> 30 the schools start "bumping" into capacity issues and CAPS. He said he is skeptical at this <br /> 31 point. <br /> 32 Commissioner porosin said one issue is that these pre-k classes have fewer students <br /> 33 than a first or second grade class, and classrooms are underutilized from a space standpoint. <br /> 34 He asked if some pre-k classes are half days, and the answer was no. <br /> 35 Commissioner porosin said one thing to consider is a designated pre-k center. He said <br /> 36 some counties have this and it does not run up against SAPFO numbers. <br /> 37 Chair Jacobs said there are three sites at Twin Creeks. He said there has been <br /> 38 discussion about making one of these three sites into a joint Pre-K/administrative facility. He <br /> 39 said there have been previous discussions about this; however parents felt it was better to have <br /> 40 the pre-k spread throughout the elementary schools where they could move up into the <br /> 41 elementary grades. <br /> 42 Commissioner porosin said Pre-K is in a tenuous spot with the General Assembly and <br /> 43 there are question marks about funding and how this will look six months from now. <br /> 44 CHCCS Chair Brownstein said the other link to this is that the new school construction <br /> 45 standards require a classroom for pre-k. This means there will be some adjustments needed if <br /> 46 a stand- alone site is chosen. <br /> 47 Chair Jacobs said numbers could be run for classrooms and for students to see how it <br /> 48 all works out. This can then be discussed at the next meeting. He said the pre-k classrooms <br /> 49 are an adjunct to what is going on in the building. He also addressed the safety implications of <br /> 50 having kids apart from the main building. <br />