Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-05-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 2:52:50 PM
Creation date
8/30/2013 10:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-05-2013
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br /> 1 He said item 3 gives options and asks the Board if staff should move forward with <br /> 2 discussions with the public over the summer. <br /> 3 He said that, regarding item 4, staff has received feedback from the Board of County <br /> 4 Commissioners to move forward with outreach to meet the community to discuss the different <br /> 5 east/west route options. He said that the question is whether these routes are brought back for <br /> 6 approval in late fall or in late January. <br /> 7 Chair Jacobs said he agreed that this was a confused document that is not well <br /> 8 coordinated. He suggested that the outreach meetings are in a public meeting place, such as <br /> 9 Town Barn or somewhere with good access. <br /> 10 He sees no point in 1 and 2, as the comments have already been transmitted and this is <br /> 11 after the fact and unnecessary. <br /> 12 He said that for #3, the public outreach discussions simply need to be approved. <br /> 13 He said that#4 is really approving the presentation of service options for the regional <br /> 14 express route. <br /> 15 He said he has no opinion of the schedule in #5. He feels that staff should come back <br /> 16 in the fall about resident comments in coordinating the schedule. <br /> 17 Chair Jacobs said there needs to be some direction to both groups that there should be <br /> 18 coordination and synthesis between Triangle Transit and Orange County staff. He said that <br /> 19 right now, there is nothing that ties these two together, other than a paper statement. He said it <br /> 20 is not easy to digest this information tonight so quickly. <br /> 21 He would prefer to hear more from the public before implementation decisions are made <br /> 22 by the Board of County Commissioners. <br /> 23 His suggestion would be to approve #3, #4, #6, requesting coordination and synthesis <br /> 24 between Triangle Transit and Orange County and request staff to come back in fall with <br /> 25 implementation timeline. <br /> 26 Commissioner McKee agreed with Chair Jacobs. He said he is ready to make this <br /> 27 motion, and he feels it is definitely premature to approve service options before presentations <br /> 28 are made to the public. <br /> 29 Commissioner Pelissier agreed with comments made by Chair Jacobs, and she asked if <br /> 30 the Board had endorsed this process on May 21St. She questioned why staff was not already <br /> 31 working together to create survey tools and public meeting materials. She said the Board <br /> 32 needs to be very clear about giving direction so no more time is wasted. <br /> 33 Commissioner Pelissier said that suggestions from staff about proposed <br /> 34 implementations need to take into account cost and the money available. <br /> 35 She said that service options need to be left open for input from both Triangle Transit <br /> 36 staff and residents. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to: <br /> 39 <br /> 40 1. Approve public outreach discussions, as per Attachment 6, Part A; <br /> 41 <br /> 42 2. Approve presenting service options for Triangle Transit's Mebane-Efland- <br /> 43 Hillsborough-Durham regional express route; <br /> 44 <br /> 45 3. Request coordination and synthesis between Orange County and Triangle Transit <br /> 46 staff, based on addressing Board of County Commissioners' comments, Orange <br /> 47 County staff analysis and Triangle Transit responses; and <br /> 48 <br /> 49 4. Request staff to come back in the fall with a proposed schedule for implementation <br /> 50 based on public comment, data analysis and other relevant factors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.