Browse
Search
PH ORD-1997-043 Orange County Functional Road Classification Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance Amendment
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1990-1999
>
1997
>
PH ORD-1997-043 Orange County Functional Road Classification Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2013 9:13:29 AM
Creation date
8/29/2013 11:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/1997
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C 4a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-24-1997 - C4(a)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 11-24-1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/f- 2tV 9 *7 <br /> • Clarify definitions for Major Variance, Minor Variance, and Discharging Landfill. C ca. <br /> QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> None. <br /> QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS <br /> None. <br /> QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS <br /> None. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, second by Commissioner Halkiotis, to refer this item to the <br /> Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than January 20, <br /> 1998. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br /> Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment <br /> Subdivision Regulations Text Amendment <br /> a) Functional Road Classification <br /> This item was presented by Planner Slade McCalip in order to receive comment on the draft <br /> ordinance and Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the update to the Functional Road Classifications of the <br /> Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. On June 4, 1997 staff presented to the Planning Board a <br /> process and schedule for updating the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan including an update to <br /> the road functional classifications. An amendment to update the functional classifications is necessary because the <br /> maps in the Transportation Element to the Comprehensive Plan depict planned roads that are no longer planned. <br /> Some of the current functional classifications are not referenced by other adopted plans and ordinances and the <br /> existing classifications have been applied to every road in the county's land use planning jurisdiction outside the <br /> thoroughfare planning jurisdictions for the municipalities. This has made it difficult to clearly and quickly identify the <br /> most important roads and also apply urban road classifications to the roads in 45°x6 of the county's land use planning <br /> area. As a part of the Functional Road Classification System update,the planned major thoroughfares adopted by <br /> Orange County municipalities which are outside of a municipality's land use planning jurisdiction will be presented for <br /> consideration and adoption by Orange County. In this way Orange County can classify the proposed thoroughfares <br /> and then protect the rights-of-way for those thoroughfares that are consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked for clarification about how the roads inside the municipal jurisdiction and the <br /> roads in Orange County compare on the colored map. She asked if they were using the same definition. She asked <br /> for clarification about how they would be used together with the municipal plan. <br /> Slade McCalip indicated that they were not using the same definitions. Chapel Hill and Carrboro use the <br /> definitions in the existing plan and Hillsborough is using the States functional classification. DOT was responsible for <br /> doing the classifications, some of which are based on maintenance. A lot of the DOT roads in urban areas were <br /> classified as major thoroughfares which relate to arterial roads out in the County. He agreed that there was a change <br /> at the Town boundaries but it is coordinated in this plan. He felt that using this designation would simplify <br /> identification so that the same classification would be used throughout the county. This would not be a <br /> Transportation Plan. It would help in the consideration and design when the traffic projects are identified next year. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked what Chapel Hill's classification was for Old Lystra Road. Slade indicated that <br /> he would have to look at Chapel Hill's classification for that information. <br /> There was further discussion about specific roads. Slade McCalip stated that this plan was not intended to <br /> direct traffic but rather to indicate how roads are actually being used. <br /> Commissioner Gordon pointed out that if the system called for certain roads to be upgraded then that would <br /> encourage traffic. She mentioned that if the assumption was that Old Lystra, 15-501 and Smith Level are all at least <br /> collectors,then in order to get around laterally you would have to classify Damascus Church Road . She requested <br /> that additional consideration be given to Damascus Church Road and Old Greensboro out to White Cross. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.