Orange County NC Website
9 29 <br /> • Based on the density of development(dwelling units per acre), fixed route transit service in <br /> this area would likely operate below the system's productivity standard, <br /> • Rogers Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph. Without improvements to the road <br /> shoulders, it may be difficult to provide safe service stops with a bus along this road. Bus <br /> pull-offs on a level terrain could cost between 55,000 and S 1 5,000 each. <br /> • If service is to operate in both directions along Rogers Road, a suitable location to turn a bus <br /> around wound need to be located,possible on Eubanks Road at the Landfill or Pu /Ride Lot. <br /> Service by Others. The Orange County Office on Aging provides the following transportation <br /> services to the Rogers Road area on a routine basis: <br /> • Fixed route service for eligible senior citizens on a daily basis <br /> • Medical_trips ona dQOtiaad nspomcive basis <br /> • Trips for dialysis patients tlmeeaimes per week <br /> The Office of Agin t,hW bM providing tisnspartation services in Orange County { primarily <br /> outside the Chapel Kill Transit service area) for many years. Within the last few years, this <br /> agency has begun operating fixed mute service to the general public from the northern part of the <br /> county to Chapel F1s�t-'Tlnsx is auo#' r option for providing transit service to the Rogers Road <br /> area. <br /> 11. PLANNING BOUNDARY CHANGES <br /> The Planning Boundary(or future annexation boundary)is shown on the Joint Planning Area Lard <br /> Use Plan(Attachment 9),and is referred to in the Joint Planning Agreemem.. <br /> The present process for char= the boundary would be to change the line on the Land Use Plan. <br /> This could be accomplished following a Joist Public Hearing(with the three elected bodies)and a <br /> subsequent approval individually by each of the ttiree elected boards. <br /> We believe that conducting an election,with preparation,distribution,and casting,of ballots,would <br /> be problematic. ' Infa®al, balloting would not provide reliable results, and a f xtual bbxHng <br /> referendum pooceu with the standard controls as normally conducted by the Board of Elections <br /> would be expensive,cumbe--..;-and may not be a legal option. We suggest instead following the <br /> typical process for Baia m public opinion about an issue:conduct a public hearing or forum, well <br /> publicized,giving opportuaW for Wdivid»alsto come and express dicir opinions before our elected <br /> boards,who-would th udw all comments into consideration before making a decision. <br /> 12. EUBANKS ROAD LANDFILL-POST CLOSURE USE <br />