Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-1997 - 11c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 10-21-1997
>
Agenda - 10-21-1997 - 11c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2013 9:14:01 AM
Creation date
8/15/2013 9:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
11c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19971021
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 26 <br /> We believe it also would be workable to enforce the relevanrState law(see above at 3), requiring <br /> tarps when they would be required by State law. <br /> 5. INCREASING LITTER PICKUP FREQUENCY <br /> The frequency of litter collection has already been increased to the level suggested in this <br /> recommendation, effective July 1997. The annual cost of providing. this level of service is <br /> approximately S5,500. <br /> 6. POLICY GOVERNING CONSTRUCTION AT LANDFILL <br /> The landfill will be under construction on a.nearly contiauous basis for most of its remaining life. <br /> The nature of the operation is that the facility is congructed: day-by-day,until design capacity is <br /> attained. <br /> Below we comment on specific issues raised by the Wonting Group. <br /> a) GencraL,Policy We belim a general construction maoageummt policy cam.be drafted as <br /> envisioned by the Waddng Group,including ways to mitigate or eliminate adverse.effects on <br /> landfill neighbors. <br /> b) NQtice._=m We believe it would be feasible to maim n a list of add:+ s within the <br /> ideatified area for use is giving'notice.of dpificant.conswxtion eveab, including initiation <br /> of major projects. <br /> Regarding posting of signs, we believe such signs would be posted almost continuously for the <br /> remain*life of the landfill this is desirable is debatable. <br /> c) Blasting. A specific Policy governing blasting can be ptePated. However, we' do not <br /> anticipate nay blasting on the eaasting landfill once the blasting scheduled for the next mouth <br /> takes place. <br /> d) Con=m on limits. Under ordinary circrurlstauccs, there would be no construction activity <br /> Wang place between the horns of I i:oo PM and 6:00 AX SeMom do any activities take <br /> place after daze_ In the event of an emergency,we would expedite the,notification procedure <br /> referenced in Recommeodatioa#14. We.would place a condition on hour of construction <br /> allowed by contractors within the ccmarucma contract.But note,however,that there may be <br /> circuaastances when night work might be necessary <br /> We would require that construction activities a&=to the applicable provisions of the; <br /> Orange C`ouaty-noise ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.